Homepage -Family

Go To Search
TwitterFacebook
YouTube
 

View Other Items in this Archive | View All Archives | Printable Version

CITY OF ST. CLOUD

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES

 

DATE OF MEETING:      March 10, 2004

 

LOCATION:                   1300 9th Street - 1st Floor – DRC Conference Room; St. Cloud

 

CALL TO ORDER:         2:00 P.M.

 

CHAIRMAN:                  David Nearing, Planning/Zoning Director

 

SECRETARY:               Marty Hobbs, Development Officer

 

MEMBERS PRESENT:

Dave Nearing                 Todd Swingle                 Mark Luthie                   Lt. Dunn

Dave Ennis                    John Groenendaal          Ron Trowell                   Angelo Perri

Veronica Witol

 

NEW BUSINESS:

 

1.         Case #5-31.01 – Quinn Contractors

                                                17th Street Between Louisiana & Tennessee

                                                Rezoning

 

Mr. Jim Wells and Mr. Danny Quinn were present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         The building department does not have comments applicable to this case.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.    

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.                   Water, sewer and reclaimed water are available with required extensions.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

2.         Wastewater will go to the SSWWTP.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         None

RECOMMENDATIONS:

2.         Approved

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.                   Need an original letter of authorization that states that Danny Quinn and Jim Wells are able to speak in regard to all issues relating to this application. This should be provided to the City prior to DRC or at the said meeting.

2.                   Recommend the R-3 zone as it is compatible with MDR.

3.                   Recommend that the City used the fee simple town home conditions based on the single family within the area.

4.                   Those conditions are:

1. Apartment style multifamily development shall be prohibited.

2. Any residential development shall be of fee simple ownership.

Page 2, DRC Minutes - 03/10/05

 

 

3. The height of all structures on the subject property shall be limited to a maximum of 28 feet.  No structure shall contain more than 2 stories.

4. The community will have landscaping maintained by the community.

5. If the property owner is unable to develop the subject property with these conditions then the property owner will rezone to PUD.

6. All units shall be a minimum of 20 ft in width.

7. A uniform six foot tall and wide fence panel will be erected perpendicular to the rear of units to provide an outdoor privacy

 

Mr. Quinn noted that he would like to have the requirement for the fencing panels at the rear of the units removed.

 

Mr. Nearing explained that the Planning Board and City Council liked to see the panels if there were no screen rooms on the units.

 

Mr. Quinn explained that all of the units would have either back porches or screen rooms.

 

Mr. Nearing asked if the deed restrictions prohibited grills and Mr. Quinn noted they did not.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS:

5.         Tree preservation and pedestrian access to Budinger Avenue and the new School will be item the City will look for on the PSP.

INFORMATION:

6.         Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review.  Revised plans submitted after the allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees.

7.         All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal.  Rolled plans will not be accepted.

 

Mr. Quinn asked what comments 6 & 7 were for and Mr. Nearing explained that they were standard comments and should have been removed.

 

Mr. Wells asked when plans could be submitted for the project and Mr. Nearing explained that they could be submitted at any time as long as the applicant understood it was at his own risk before Council give final approval.

 

Scheduling for the public hearings process was briefly discussed.

 

Mr. Nearing advised the applicant to utilize the ITE and have figures on traffic ready for the public hearings.  He suggested that the presentation to the Planning Board and City Council might want to touch on how this project is providing “in fill” for the area.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         The District has no comment regarding this case.

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY (911 ADDRESSING)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

FINDING:

The DRC recommended approval with the conditions as stated.  This case will be moved forward to the Planning Board and City Council for public hearings.

 

 

 

 

2.         Case #5-32.01 – Rocker’s Townhomes

                                                335 E. 10th Street

                                                Annexation/LUA/Zoning

Page 3, DRC Minutes - 03/10/05

 

 

Mr. Jeff Ball and Mr. John Moody were present to represent the application.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.    

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         Water is currently available and sewer is not available to this site.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         None

RECOMMENDATIONS:

2.         Approved

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.                   Please submit legal description in Microsoft Word format.

2.                   Apartment style multifamily development shall be prohibited.      

3.                   Any residential development shall be of fee simple ownership.

4.                   The height of all structures on the subject property shall be limited to a maximum of 28 feet.  No structure shall contain more than 2 stories.

5.                   The community will have landscaping maintained by the community.

6.                   A 6-foot masonry wall will buffer adjacent any Low Density Residential neighborhoods

7.                   All units shall be a minimum of 20 ft in width

8.                   A uniform six foot tall and wide fence panel will be erected perpendicular to the rear of units to provide an outdoor privacy area.

 

Mr. Ball asked for clarification of the 6’ tall/wide wall to be erected for outdoor privacy.

 

Ms. Witol and Mr. Groenendaal explained the requirement.

 

Mr. Ball asked if it had to be opaque and Mr. Nearing noted that it did.

 

9.                   Any criteria or standards not addressed by the above conditions shall comply with the applicable regulations of the R-3, Multiple Family Dwelling District, contained in the City of St. Cloud Land Development Code.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

10.        Recommend approval of annex, land use and zoning with the above conditions.

INFORMATION:

11.        Item shall not be placed on any agenda until the legal description has been delivered.  However, due to the nature of the request and scheduling conflicts, the earliest potential schedule would be the 4/19/05 Planning Board meeting and the 5/12/05 and 5/26/05 City Council Meetings.

 

Mr. Ball asked with the legal description was needed.

 

Ms. Witol explained that she needed it no later than the 31st and preferably before that.

 

12.               Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

Mr. Nearing explained that this comment had been added at the request of Osceola County.

 

Page 4, DRC Minutes - 03/10/05

 

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY (911 ADDRESSING)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

FINDING:

The DRC recommended approval with the conditions as stated.  The case will be moved forward to the Planning Board and City Council for public hearings.

 

 

 

 

3.         Case #5-33.01 – Jaffa Drive Office Warehouse Complex

                                                Lots 13 & 14, Osceola Industrial Park

                                                Site Plan

 

Mr. John Moody and Mr. Richard Carr were present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         The building department does not have comments applicable to this case.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         The proposed dumpster enclosure has four gate openings with a center bollard for gate mounting. Please revise with the following suggestions. Provide only two gates without a center bollard to facilitate the width requirements of the collection vehicle.  Also, increase the depth to 12’ so the largest container available will fit when the gates are closed.             

 

Mr. Moody noted that he would comply with the condition from Public Works.

 

2.         A SFWMD permit modification will be necessary.

 

Mr. Moody noted that he had the permit and would provide staff with a copy.

 

CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.                   A Certificate of Capacity approved by City Council shall be required prior to receiving a Notice to Proceed.

2.                   A Sewer Capacity Reservation Fee in the amount of $1,997.52 shall be paid prior to issuance of a Notice to Proceed, per Resolution 98-27R.  The Sewer Capacity Reservation Fee shall be credited towards the sewer impact fee at the time of building permit.  The balance of all impact and tap fees shall be at the rate in effect at the time of building permit.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

3.                   Staff recommends approval with the above conditions.

INFORMATION:

4.                   The Sewer Capacity Reservation Fee equal to 10% of the estimated sanitary sewer impact fee.  For the industrial development, this is 26,340s.f. of building x $600 (Industrial) ÷ 1,000 = $15,804 x 10% = $1,580.40.  For the office development, this is 3,792 s.f. of building x $1,100 (office) ÷ 1,000 = $4,171.20 x 10% = $417.12. Per Resolution 98-27R. $1,580.40 + $417.12=$1,997.52.

5.                   A list of all impact fees is available from the Planning & Zoning Department upon request.

6.                   Certificate of Capacity shall be on the 4/14/05 City Council agenda

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         There is an existing 2’ water service provided for lot no. 13. The existing water service for lot no. 13 needs to service building #1 and the existing water service for lot no. 14 needs to service building #2.

 

Mr. Moody noted that he would comply with the condition from the Lines Division.

Page 5, DRC Minutes - 03/10/05

 

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1.         If the electric is underground the owner will install all preliminary conduit and the concrete transformer pad.  The secondary conduit, wire, and terminations are the responsibility of the owner.  Please have the conduit installed and inspected by OUC three weeks before you need pre-power.  Please note per Dr. Phillips all electric going into the site must be underground.

2.         A utility easement will be required once the location of the transformer and primary run is determined.

3.         There may be costs for temp. power to this site.

4.         There may be costs to provide electric service to this project, please contact Development Services.

5.         OUC can provide parking lot lights for this project, please contact Development Services.

6.         Please send all site and electric information to OUC Development Services.

            OUC Development Services                    (407) 236-9652 – Fax (407) 236-9628

            500 South Orange Avenue                      email: developmentservices@ouc.com

            P.O. Box 3193

            Orlando, FL  32802

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         None

RECOMMENDATIONS:

2.         Approved

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.                   A letter from Dr. Phillips Inc. Architectural Committee will be required granting their approval of the site plan and any plans or permits in the future.

 

Mr. Moody noted that he had spoken with the committee and that they were in the process of reviewing the plan at this time and he would submit a copy of the letter to staff as soon as he received it.

 

2.                   Please change coversheet to remove the 50’ front setback from Jaffa Drive.  This setback is required for Hickory Tree Road.

 

Mr. Moody noted that he would revise the plan accordingly.

 

3.                   Please change the traffic statement to reflect the 7th edition of the I.T.E. edition and the peak hour of adjacent street traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m.

 

Mr. Moody noted that he would revise the plan accordingly.

 

4.                   Will Building Number 2 be an additional phase? If so what is the time line?

 

Mr. Moody explained that both were to be built at the same time.

 

5.                   Please provide elevation of buildings.

 

Mr. Moody noted that the elevation would be provided with the revised plans.

 

6.                   Please provide tree survey.  Trees shall be replaced at a rate of 2 for 1.

 

Mr. Moody noted that he would include a tree survey with the revised plans.

 

7.                   Please provide calculation for landscape area to reflect the total landscape area must be 5% of the total area less building surface area not 5 % of the building surface area. 

 

Mr. Moody noted that he would revise the plans accordingly.

 

8.                   Please add trees in every landscape island.

Page 6, DRC Minutes - 03/10/05

 

 

Mr. Carr noted that he needed some clarification regarding the trees and the issue was discussed.  After an explanation by Mr. Carr, Ms. Witol noted that she would remove the comment.

 

9.                   Please show water source for irrigation.

 

Mr. Moody noted that he would show a water source on the revised plans but he was not sure if an irrigation system was to be installed.

 

10.               Please combine parcels.

 

Mr. Moody asked why the parcels needed to be combined when they were under a single ownership.

 

Mr. Nearing explained that the intent was to prevent the buildings being split and sold as separate developments.

 

Mr. Moody noted that he understood and would unify the parcels.

 

Ms. Hobbs advised Mr. Moody that he would need to provide verification of the unification to her prior to obtaining approved plans.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS:

11.        Recommend approval with above conditions

INFORMATION:

12.        Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review.  Revised plans submitted after the allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees.

13.        All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal.  Rolled plans will not be accepted.

14.        Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

Mr. Moody asked why he was being required to seek permission from Osceola County when this project wasn’t accessed by a County road.

 

Ms. Witol explained that the County had made the comment and she had to include it.

 

Mr. Luthie noted that he agreed with the applicant and that this comment should be stricken.

 

Mr. Nearing agreed and advised Mr. Witol to strike the comment and notify the County that it had been removed.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

CONDITIONS:

1.         A South Florida Water Management District permit is required for this project.

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY (911 ADDRESSING)

CONDITIONS:

1.         Submit site plan showing buildout for addressing after final plat & site plan approval.

 

FIRE:

No written comments were submitted by the Fire Department

 

Fire Marshall Ennis noted that all standard fire comments would apply to this review.

 

FINDING:

The DRC recommended approval with the conditions as stated.  The applicant will resubmit revised plans for sign-off within sixty (60) days of this review.

 

 

 

Page 7, DRC Minutes - 03/10/05

 

 

MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS:

 

The following item was not a part of the regular agenda for this meeting.

 

1.         Case #4-72.05 – Corvette Roadside Café

                                                122 14th Street

                                                Site Plan

 

Mr. John Groenendaal noted that this case had previously been tabled by the DRC pending resolution of some outstanding issues with some departments.  He noted that those issues had since been resolved but that the applicant needed approval by the DRC before revised plans could be submitted and signed off.

 

Mr. Jeff Ball was present to represent the application.

 

The changes that had been made to the plans were briefly discussed and the Committee approved it with conditions.

 

There was no further discussion regarding this case.

 

ADJOURNMENT:           The meeting was adjourned at 2:25 P.M.