View Other Items in this Archive | View All Archives | Printable Version

CITY OF ST. CLOUD

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES

 

DATE OF MEETING:      December 29, 2005

 

LOCATION:                   1300 9th Street - 1st Floor – DRC Conference Room; St. Cloud

 

CALL TO ORDER:         2:00 P.M.

 

CHAIRMAN:                  David Nearing, Planning and Zoning Director

 

SECRETARY:               Michelle Orton, DRC Secretary

 

MEMBERS PRESENT:

Mark Luthie                   Lt. Bret Dunn                 Rick Mauro                    Michele Bronson           

Jeffrey Higgins               Dave Ennis                    Bob Friend                    Eric Van Tassel

Kristin Caborn

 

Dave Ennis, Ron Trowell, Veronica Witol and John Groenendaal notified the Committee that they would not be present and were excused.

 

NEW BUSINESS:

 

1. Case #6-01.03 – Main Street Winter Events/Friday Fests

New York Avenue (in front of City Hall)

Multiple Special Events/Major

 

Amy Hartman, with Main Street, was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         We have not provided barricades in the past? The setup and tear down of the barricades is the real

issue.

 

Ms. Hartman noted that she spoke with Tom Hurt regarding the barricades because there will not be enough.

 

Ms. Caborn mentioned that they will also be short until January but they were going to borrow some from Public Works until they get theirs in January.

 

Mr. Nearing suggested they talk to Osceola County Road and Bridge Department on Kissimmee Park Road.  He then asked Ms. Hartman what time they would be setting up.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         All fire protection equipment; building exits and other safety features shall remain accessible.

2.         A lane shall remain open to allow emergency vehicles access if needed. (Movable barricades are

acceptable.)

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         We need to know more detail about these events, theme, type of music/bands, estimated attendance

etc.

 

Ms. Hartman noted that she has met with Lt. Dunn and he indicated to her that additional police would not be needed because alcohol will not be there and Park and Rec. will be helping with the stage.

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         All handicap curb cuts are to remain open and clear at all times.

2.         No street closures will be allowed prior to 6:00 P.M. to allow staff and customers adequate ingress and

egress of City Hall parking areas.

3.         All property owners along the proposed street closures are to be notified, in writing, a minimum of ten

(10) days prior to the event.

 

Ms. Hartman indicated they would be setting up at 5:00.

 

Ms. Caborn noted that they would be setting up the stage at 4:00

 

Mr. Van Tassel noted that they will not be on the street so it won’t interfere with traffic.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS:

4.         At the request of the St. Cloud Police Department, past Main Street events have been required to

submit to the DRC specific information for each monthly event. Planning recommends that this

information be submitted directly to the Police Department without formal review by the DRC.

INFORMATION:

5.         Please be advised that applications for Special Events must be submitted a minimum of six weeks prior

to the event to allow adequate time for review and comment. Any future late submittals will require

written direction from the City Manager for inclusion on an agenda.

6.         As a DRC approved special Event, the applicant is authorized to utilize off-site signage to advertise

and/or direct traffic for the event. Please be advised that all signage must be placed so as to prevent

visual obstruction to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic, must be free standing and may be utilized

beginning one week prior to the event. All signage must be removed the day following the final day of

the event.

 

PARKS & RECREATION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No problem with this event, they do not need anything from us.

INFORMATION:

2.         When I get my new mobile 24’x24’ stage in, I will notify Amy that they will then be able to use it.

 

Ms. Bronson wanted to know if the stage would be located in the same place it was during the Tree Lighting Ceremony.

 

Ms. Caborn indicated that the stage would be where the tree is located now, in the court yard.

 

RISK MANAGEMENT 12/15/05

CONDITIONS:

1.         Vendor must provide acceptable Certificates of Insurance via ACORD form or sign City Waiver

documents, no later than 10 days prior to the event.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

2.         Increase city parking lot lightning from the prior the Tree Lighting event, to reduce the chance of

possible falls over the parking bumpers.

3.         Make sure that all food vendors have appropriate training, certifications and liability insurance to reduce

the chance of possible liability upon Main Street or the City upon an incident.

INFORMATION:

4.         Certificate of insurance has been reviewed and meets all necessary requirements/guidelines

 

Ms. Bronson wanted more information regarding the lighting.  The lighting during the Christmas Tree lighting was not safe.  She felt that it was a hazard for the pedestrians and wanted to know how it would be handled.

 

There was discussion on the previous lighting

 

Ms. Hartman indicated that the lighting will be above eye level, they will use a different type of lighting for this event.

 

Ms. Bronson noted that would be better and that she approved of that.

 

FINDING: The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Case #6-01.05 – Gospel Sing 2006

1201 17th Street (Veterans Park)

Special Event/Major

 

Amy Hartman, with Main Street, was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         All fire protection equipment; building exits and other safety features shall remain accessible.

2.         A lane shall remain open to allow emergency vehicles access if needed. (Movable barricades are

acceptable.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         The applicant is to verify that all food vendors are properly licensed and inspected.

INFORMATION:

2.         As a DRC approved Special Event, the applicant is authorized to utilize off-site signage to advertise

and/or direct traffic for the event. Please be advised that all signage must be placed so as to prevent

visual obstruction to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic, must be free standing and may be utilized

beginning one week prior to the event. All signage must be removed the day following the final day of

the event.

 

PARKS & RECREATION

CONDITIONS:

1.         You show on drawings that you will need (2) 20’x40’ tents and (2) 10’x10’ tents correct? ___________

The tents will be set up on Thursday February 2nd 2006.

2.         You listed tables on the drawing and I counted (18) tables. Is this the amount that you need?____

3.         Since your event is on a Saturday, we will store all the tables & chairs in the bandshell storage rooms

and we will put these in the storage room on Friday February 3rd.

4.         You will have to stop by the Civic Center to pick up and sign out a key to the storage room & restrooms.

5.         No Parking vehicles inside the Park.

6.         I will need someone to be at the Park around 7:30am on Thursday February 2nd. This is to make sure

that we set the tents up exactly where you want them.

7.         Make sure that you pick up and empty all trash in and around the Park.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         The Parks and Recreation Department is beginning the impact fee review process. In the interim, City

Council is requesting developers consider making cash or equipment donations to the department. A

list of equipment needed at various prices is available by contacting Kristin Caborn, Parks and

Recreation Director (407) 957-7243 or via email to kcaborn@stcloud.org.

 

Ms. Hartman indicated that she needs to meet with Parks and Rec as they get closer to the event but that she had her application in hand to hold Veterans Park.  She noted that she spoke with the City Manager and that the fee would be waived.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that they would need a memo from the City Manager stating that.

 

Ms. Caborn indicated that as soon as its submitted that they would be able to get that signed.

 

RISK MANAGEMENT 12/27/05

CONDITIONS:

1.         Vendor must provide acceptable Certificates of Insurance via ACORD form or sign City Waiver

documents, no later than 10 days prior to the event.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

2.         Make sure that all food vendors have appropriate training, certifications and liability insurance to reduce

the chance of possible liability upon Main Street or the City upon an incident.

INFORMATION:

3.         Certificate of insurance has been reviewed and meets all necessary requirements/guidelines

 

FINDING: The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Case #6-01.04 – 3rd Annual Martin Luther King, Jr. Leadership Brunch

620 17th Street (Hopkins Park)

City Sponsored Special Event/Minor

 

Kristin Caborn, Director of Park and Recreation, was present to represent the application.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that this would be the last year that it will need to come before DRC.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this event.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         All fire protection equipment; building exits and other safety features shall remain accessible.

2.         A lane shall remain open to allow emergency vehicles access if needed. (Movable barricades are

acceptable.

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments

 

PLANNING

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Planning recommends that in the future, this event be considered a Parks/Recreation authorized event

not requiring formal DRC review and approval. Should the DRC concur with this recommendation,

Planning also recommends that the Police and Fire Departments be advised of the plans for each

annual event.

INFORMATION:

2.         As a DRC approved special Event, the applicant is authorized to utilize off-site signage to advertise

and/or direct traffic for the event. Please be advised that all signage must be placed so as to prevent

visual obstruction to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic, must be free standing and may be utilized

beginning one week prior to the event. All signage must be removed the day following the final day of

the event.

 

PARKS & RECREATION

CONDITIONS:

1.         Since this is a Parks & Recreation event we will comply with all that is asked of us to do for this event.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

2.         I recommend that this does not have to come back to DRC unless there is a major change with

the program.

 

RISK MANAGEMENT 12.15.05

CONDITIONS:

1.         Vendor must provide acceptable Certificates of Insurance via ACORD form or sign City Waiver

documents, no later than 10 days prior to the event.

INFORMATION:

2.         Certificate of insurance has been reviewed and meets all necessary requirements/guidelines.

 

FINDING:  The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

4. Case #6-25.01 – Timothy Flanders (Planner, Jeff Higgins)

3571 Buckingham Court

Abandonment of Easement

 

Scott Urban, with Distinctive Homes, was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this abandonment.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         We will need to review the redesign of the swale prior to making our recommendation. We did not

find any design information in the DRC packet.

 

Mr. Friend indicated that he did not receive anything regarding the drainage.

 

Mr. Urban noted that he brought those plans with him regarding the swail

 

Mr. Luthie wanted to know if those plans also have information regarding the retaining wall.

 

Mr. Urban wanted to know how much detail was he looking for, would it be alright to give him a wall detail that shows the four corners.

 

Mr. Luthie noted that would be fine for moving it to Planning Board but that he would need something to show City Council.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that Mark Luthie is okay for moving to Planning Board.

 

Mr. Urban noted that he would get that information to Mark right away.

 

Mr. Luthie noted that he needs it for Planning Board.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1.         The 10’ foot wide utility easement that abuts Buckingham Court needs to stay in place. Any other

easements are OK to abandon.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments

 

PLANNING

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Approval of the 10’ X 35’ easement abandonment.

INFORMATION:

1.         Letters were sent to the Utility Companies December 15, 2005.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         The District has no comment.

 

FINDING:  The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

5. Case #5-31.04 – Tradition (Planner, John Groenendaal)

South of 17th & Louisiana Avenue

Final Plat

 

There was no one present to represent the application.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that the Planning Department has been notified by Mr. Quinn that he would like to continue this project until the next meeting.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this final plat.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         Please provide the OR Book and Page Number of the 40’ wide drainage easement along the east

boundary of the project. Does the above mentioned easement run north to the public ROW known as

17th St.?

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         Describe a minimum 40’ x 40’ utility easement for the sanitary sewer lift station site.

2.         Describe a minimum 50’ utility easement over the existing drainage easement where the water and

reclaimed water mains connect to Julianne Ct.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         The legal on boundary survey and final plat don’t match.

2.         Lot 45 is to be setback 30 feet, revise

3.         Will not schedule this for Planning Board until the PSP/Construction Plans are approved.

4.         Follow the Plat Checklist once the Final Plat has City Council approval.

INFORMATION:

1.         Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review. Revised plans submitted after the

allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees. Please be

advised that the number of plans required for submittal has increased to 15 sets.

2.         All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal. Rolled plans will not be accepted.

3.         Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior

to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         The District recommends approval of this case.

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY (911 ADDRESSING)

INFORMATION:

1.         Street names for this project have been approved.

 

FINDING: Per the applicant, this will be brought back before the Committee, no action was taken.

 

 

 

 

6. Case #6-18.02 – Sugar Mill (Planner, Jeff Higgins)

West of Brown Chapel; N. of 5th Street

Abandonment of Right-of-Way

 

There was no one present to represent the application.

 

Mr. Higgins indicated that Brighthouse had an objection to the full abandonment of the Right-of-Way but would agree upon a Public Utility Easement.

 

Mr. Mauro agreed with Brighthouse.

 

Mr. Nearing noted to Mr. Higgins that they would need to do an adjustment.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this abandonment.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         A utility easement would have to remain over this area, there is a 10” water main which services Sugar

Mill within this area.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         The Fire Rescue Department can not comment with the information provided.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         It is OK with The Orlando Utilities Commission Electric Engineering Division to abandon the Right-of-

Way.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         Sealed Survey must be submitted.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

2.         Approval for R-O-W abandonment.

INFORMATION:

3.         Letters were sent to the Utility Companies December 19, 2005.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

FINDING: The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. Case #5-85.02 – Turtle Creek, Phase 1-A (Planner, Veronica Witol)

Narcoossee Road & Rummell Road

Final Plat

 

Bill Hart, with Franklin, Hart & Reid Associates, was present to represent the application.

Dave Schmitt, with Levitt & Sons, was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this final plat.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         Tracts D1 and D2 are listed under the general notes to be dedicated to the HOA? Please explain or

revise the plat.

 

Mr. Hart noted that Tracts D1 and D2 are going to be dedicated to the HOA.

 

Mr. Luthie wanted to know what they were.

 

Mr. Hart noted that they capture off site water and redirect it to the pond P2 which is a county pond.

 

2.         We could not locate Tract D3 on the plat.

 

Mr. Luthie also noted that there is not a D3, so that will need to be taken off the plans.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1.         The Final Plat meets the requirements of the OUC Electric Engineering Division.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         Please provide documentation from Osceola County that Concurrency has been approved for this

development.

 

Mr. Hart indicated that they have a copy from Osceola County.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that if they would give there office a copy they can get it in the file.

 

2.         Please provide copy of the approved construction plans from Osceola County and any approval

paperwork.

 

Mr. Hart noted that it is close to being approved.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that as soon as possible he will need to get that to Mark Luthie.

 

3.         Please have the street names approved by Osceola County 911. A form must be received from 911

prior to plat being released for recording.

 

Mr. Hart indicated that they have been approved by 911 and that they should have sent them a copy.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that it probably went to the county so they will need to forward a copy to Veronica Witol who is the planner on this project.

 

4.         Are all the side and rear drainage easements functional? Please remove all easements that are not

required by the utilities etc. The City does not want easements where they are not needed.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that the city does not like drainage easements where they aren’t needed..

 

Mr. Hart noted that they have no problem with that they will be removed and the functioning ones on the plat and the 10 foot utility easements on the front will be on the plans. 

 

5.         Please graphically depict all easements.

6.         Has the landscaping been approved by Osceola County? If so, please provide.

 

Mr. Hart indicated that landscaping has not yet been approved but it is close.

 

7.         The Osceola county approval dated 3/27/05 states that separate CDP approval shall be required for all

active recreation plans prior to recordation of the plat. Has this happened?

 

Mr. Hart wanted it noted for clarification that the approval date was May 27, 2005, this is what he is working off the May 27th letter the CDP has for the recreation area, it has not bee approved but it has been submitted.

 

Mr. Schmitt noted that they have been submitted and should be approved by the first or second week in January.

 

8.         A special condition on the 3/27/05 letter states that the developer shall pre-pay transportation impact

fees at the time of final plat approval for each phase of the development. Has this happened? If so,

was the County or City paid?

 

Mr. Schmitt noted that has happened and sent to the county July 14, 2005 and they would send a copy.

 

9.         A special condition also states that a Comprehensive Development Plan must be submitted within 2

years of the approval or the approval will become void. Has this happened? If so please provide.

 

Mr. Hart indicated that has been submitted as of December 12, 2005 but that it has not yet been approved.

 

10.        Another special condition states that The Developer shall be fully responsible to design and construct a

traffic signal at CR 15 and Rummell Road. The developer shall complete construction and make this

signal operational prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Capacity.

 

Mr. Hart noted that the county has approved the plan and construction is imminent.

 

Mr. Luthie noted that he has seen them moving the poles.

 

Mr. Schmitt indicated that they were trying to fast tract that.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that he believed the Certificate of Capacity would be going to council on the 12th of January.

 

11.        Is there a wall separating this property from an adjacent or from the road? If so please put in separate

tract.

 

Mr. Hart replied, “No” there will be no wall, the large landscape tract was widened to put in a berm.  It will be the road drainage, berm and landscaping.

 

Mr. Friend wanted to know if they allocated a utility easement on Narcoossee Road.

 

Mr. Hart noted that there are no utility easements on Narcoossee Road.  There are drainage tracts next to the right-of-way that are just for drainage.  Tracts L1 and L2 are for the landscape adjacent to the road.

 

Mr. Friend wanted to know how far off the road they were.

 

Mr. Hart said from the ROW there are 80 foot half sections, 40 feet for drainage and 40 feet for landscaping and that would be available for utilities.

 

Mr. Nearing questioned if the county had an ultimate build out.

 

Mr. Hart noted that he knew there will be a big ditch on one side but that was all he knew.

 

Mr. Luthie indicated that they can close it in as part of the construction.

 

Mr. Nearing questioned if they would be putting in a sidewalk or putting money into escrow for that.

 

Mr. Hart noted that he was not aware of that happening.

 

12.        Instead of using easements for the alley access, we prefer these to be tracts. Please review these to

see if using these as tracts would conform with your PUD zoning standards (minimum lot widths,

setbacks etc.) If so, please revise. If not, please consider doing these as tracts now, and Staff will

support revising the PUD documents to allow these dimensions.

 

Mr. Hart noted that if they converted these to tracts that the ultimate lot size would be reduced down to 25 x 110, in other locations they prefer to have the easements.  He wanted to know if there was anyway to keep the easements.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that we like the tracts dedicated to the HOA that way when everyone is gone we don’t have a property owner calling and saying their neighbor is blocking an easement and then it would need to go to court.  This way the HOA can be responsible for it, that’s why we prefer tracts.  Mr. Nearing asked that they keep this in mind for future reference.

 

Mr. Schmitt, stated that they have a product already developed at this time for this lot size.

 

Mr. Higgins wanted to know what the size will be.

 

Mr. Hart noted that it will be 25 x 120.

 

13.        Sheet 4 of 4 shows a 75’ x 150’ area that is subject to restrictions in OR Book….. What are these

restrictions? Bill Hart called and said no telecommunications operations in that tract.

 

Mr. Hart noted that this was a remenant that was dedicated with a condition that it not be used for telecommunitions.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that this is probably indicating a cell tower.

 

Mr. Hart indicated that was correct, it could not be used for a cell tower.

 

14.        Why does tract R-1 fall short of Rummell Road. Will the sidewalk not connect with the sidewalk that will

be on Rummell Road in the future. Bill Hart informed would see change.

 

Mr. Hart noted that they have revised plans for the whole of Rummell Road and that it goes all the way up.

 

15.        Can Tracts P1 and P2 be combined? Bill Hart informed they are 2 tracts because one holds the

County’s drainage and one holds the projects.

 

Mr. Hart noted that P1 and P2 cannot be combined because P2 is county.

 

16.        Tract P-1 should be dedicated to Osceola County?

 

Mr. Hart noted that it will be dedicated.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated he needed it make sure it was dedicated to Osceola County.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Staff recommends bringing a copy of the proposed architecture to the Board meetings.

 

INFORMATION:

1.         Our Department policy regarding the recording of plats has changed. Please come to the Department

of Planning and Zoning for a copy of the checklist or you may download it at www.stcloud.org.

2.         Please be aware that the department of Planning and Zoning is now requiring separate site plan

approval for any pool and clubhouse.

3.         Please be aware that the Department of Planning and Zoning is now requiring a mini site plan approval

for a model center. Model Center cannot be permitted until the plat has been recorded.

4.         Please submit 16 reduced copies (11 x 17) of plat prior to being scheduled for Planning Board.

Additionally please provide 15 full sets of plans for approval. All Departments will need to sign off on

the plat before going forward to Planning Board. If you would like the plat to be on the January 24th

Planning Board agenda please submit the plans by January 3, 2006 in order to ensure that all

departments have time to review.

5.         Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review. Revised plans submitted after the

allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees. Please be

advised that the number of plans required for submittal has increased to 15 sets.

6.         All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal. Rolled plans will not be accepted.

7.         Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         The District recommends approval of this case.

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY (911 ADDRESSING)

CONDITIONS:

1.         Prior to submitting final, applicant shall clear all proposed street names with the 911 Addressing

Department. Please submit final plat for review.

 

FINDING:  The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8. Case #6-30.01 – Fire Station Park (Planner, Jeff Higgins)

NE Corner of Minnesota & 10th Street

Concept Plan

 

John Dollar, with Osceola Engineering, was present to represent the applicant.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this concept plan.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Please be advised that the Certificate of Capacity will not be moved forward to City Council for approval

until such time as the applicant notifies the Planner that it is needed. Your planner will place the item on

the next available City Council agenda.

 

Mr. Dollar indicated that the Certificate of Capacity application will be started and submitted.

 

Mr. Nearing wanted to know if there will be water and a restroom.

 

Ms. Caborn indicated that there will be.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         After initial review of the limited information inherent with a concept plan, nothing appears as if it would

cause an adverse affect on fire department operations. Since items addressing fire protection generally

are not shown on concept plans, the fire rescue department will further review the project at the time of

site plan submittal.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1.         The Park looks like a good concept. OUC can provide site lighting if required.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments

           

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         Will parking be allowed to reverse into ROW?

 

Mr. Dollar noted even though this is a neighborhood park they will need parking spaces and that they show 10 spaces along 9th Street and that it extends into the driveway of 9th Street.  He indicated that he may need a  variance.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that backing into the ROW is specific to Commercial Development and that a variance is not necessary.

 

2.         Parking stall dimensions are 10 X 18.

 

Mr. Dollar noted that they are 10 x 18 but that includes a walkway.

 

3.         Does the fence enclose the entire east side?

 

Mr. Dollar indicated that the intention of the 4 foot fence is to keep the kids from running into 10th Street and only extends a portion on the East side, that they will use the alley for maintenance and their vehicles.

 

Mr. Nearing wanted to know if we own any land on the other side of the alley.

 

Ms. Caborn noted that we do not.

 

There was discussion on the alley.

 

4.                   Two more trees may be appropriate along the North landscape buffer.

 

Mr. Dollar indicated that they will add two more trees.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS:

5.         Approval

INFORMATION:

6.         Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior

to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

Mr. Dollar noted that they have acknowledged Osceola County.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that may change shortly so that may go away.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.                   This project will require review by the City Engineering Department only.

 

Mr. Dollar indicated that they will go through Engineering.

 

FINDING:  This being a concept plan, there is no approval or denial.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9. Case #6-29.01 – Sugar Mill Office Park (Planner, Veronica Witol)

401 Kissimmee Park Road

PSP/Final Construction Plans

 

Shawn Hindle, Hanson, Walter and Associates, was present to represent the applicant.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that he had to make a comment on behalf of the planner.  First, the tree survey was not accurate.  According to the City Arborist, you have missed cluster of trees.  Ms. Witol is not here today but last week her feeling was denial.  Staff advised Mr. Hindle  that he has a choice of requesting a continuance or withdraw and reapply.

 

Mr. Hindle wanted to know what a continuance meant.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that he could get together with Ms. Witol and Ms. Duffy and work on revising and work with where the trees are located.

 

Mr. Hindle noted that a tree survey was done by Johnston, and that there were still a lot of water oaks there and that they couldn’t account for all of them.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that there is a 60 inch Live Oak and clusters with 45-50 inch trees that aren’t even shown on the plans.  He recommended that Mr. Hindle get together with Ms. Witol and Ms. Duffy next week and see what they can work out.  Ms. Duffy has gone out there and has a very detailed map that you can take a look at.

 

Mr. Hindle noted that he did walk the site and saw trees that were not on the plans.  He was sure that Mr. Schoolfield, Ms. Duffy and the landscape architect had marked all of the trees. 

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that there isn’t a lot that can be resolved here.

 

Mr. Hindle wanted to know if he could get back on the next DRC.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that he would need to speak with Ms. Witol and that she would make sure he was on the agenda when the plan was ready.

 

Mr. Hindle wanted to know if he could discuss easements.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that he would need to get together with Mr. Luthie.

 

Mr. Luthie indicated that they could get together later and look over the plans.

 

Mr. Hindle also wanted to discuss service with Mr. Mauro.

 

Mr. Mauro also noted that they could go over the plans in his office.

 

Discussion on connection, size and how was continued by Mr. Hindle and Mr. Mauro

 

Mr. Hindle also spoke to Mr. Ennis about adding two more hydrants.

 

Mr. Ennis noted on Mr. Hindles plans where they would need to be placed.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that the city would even consider doing a variance in order to preserve some of the trees.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         At least one accessible route within the boundary of the site shall be provided

from public transportation stops, accessible parking, and accessible passenger

loading zones, and public streets or sidewalks to the accessible building entrance

they serve. The accessible route shall, to the maximum extent feasible, coincide

with the route for the general public. per section 11-4.3.2 (1) of the Florida

Building Code 2004 Handicap Accessibility Code.

2.         At least one accessible route shall connect accessible buildings, facilities, elements and spaces that are

on the same site, per section 11-4.3.2 (2) of the Florida Building Code 2004 Handicap Accessibility

Code

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         Please utilize the City standard detail for the single and double dumpster enclosures which can be

found on our website.

2.         The limits of construction for phase 1 will need to provide a positive outfall for the stormwater

management system.

3.         Please show all dimensions of the proposed parking spaces.

4.         Please show all width dimensions of the travel ways.

 

CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         Please revise your application to reflect the correct square footage and the total area of each lot.

2.         A Certificate of Capacity approved by City Council shall be required prior to receiving a Notice to

Proceed.

3.         A Sewer Capacity Reservation Fee shall be paid prior to issuance of a Notice to Proceed, per

Resolution 98-27R. The Sewer Capacity Reservation Fee shall be credited towards the sewer impact

fee at the time of building permit. The balance of all impact and tap fees shall be at the rate in effect at

the time of building permit. The amount cannot be figured until the total square footage of all the

buildings is known.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Staff recommends approval with the above conditions.

INFORMATION:

1.         The Sewer Capacity Reservation Fee equal 10% of the estimated sanitary sewer impact fee. For the

commercial development, this is: ??? s.f of building x $1,100 ÷ 1,000 = $??? x 10% = $2,752.53 due at

the Certificate of Capacity. Per Resolution 98-27R.

2.         A list of all impact fees is available from the Planning & Zoning Department upon request.

3.         Please be advised that the Certificate of Capacity will not be moved forward to City Council for approval

until such time as the applicant notifies the Planner that it is needed. Your planner will place the item on

the next available City Council agenda.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         Change the description of the fire hydrant wet tap to a tapping sleeve and valve.

2.         Identify the sanitary sewer manholes as manhole number 33-80, 33-89 & 33-90.

3.         Remove the note stating, construction irrigation water meter & gate valve. Reclaimed water can only be

used for irrigation.

4.         Provide a minimum 20’ utility easement centered over the sewer main and laterals, up to the clean-outs.

5.         Provide an 8” water main to loop through the property and connect to a stub-out from the adjacent

property in the rear, and provide a minimum 15’ utility easement centered over the main.

6.         Provide a minimum 15’ utility easement centered over the fire hydrant and main.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         Add a hydrant northeast near dumpster and southeast near building #2.

Before and during construction, when combustibles are brought onto the site in such quantities as

deemed hazardous by the fire official, paved roads to provide access for fire vehicles and a suitable

water supply for fire protection acceptable to the fire department shall be provided and maintained.

(L.D.C. 6.1.21.3)

2.         Fire Hydrants and Fire Protection Appliances shall have clearances of 7.5 feet front and sides and 4

foot to the rear for hydrants. (NFPA1 18.3.4.1)

3.         Proof of adequate fire flow must be submitted to the public works department for verification prior to site

plan approval by the fire rescue department.

INFORMATION:

1.         Will there be a sprinkler system for building #2? If so show FDC on site plans.

2.         If building #2 is not sprinklered occupancy shall be for office only.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1.         The owner will install all primary conduit and concrete transformer pads. The secondary conduit, wire

and terminations are the responsibility of the owner. Please have the conduit installed and inspected by

OUC three weeks before you need pre-power.

2.         A utility easement will be required once the location of the transformer and primary run is determined.

3.         There may be costs to provide electric service to this project. Please contact Development Services.

INFORMATION:

4.         OUC can provide parking lot lights for this project. Please contact Development Services.

5.         Please send all site and electric information to OUC Development Services

44 W. Jefferson Street (407) 236-9652 – Fax (407) 236-9628

P.O. Box 3193 email: developmentservices@ouc.com

Orlando, FL 32802

6.         Once all information is obtained by Development Services an Engineer will be assigned to the project.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         A preliminary subdivision plan is not required for this project since only 3 lots are being created.

Therefore, this will be reviewed as the site plan. Please change the coversheet to reflect this.

2.         A final plat will be required for this project

3.         Being that this covers 3 site plans, please provide the site plan review for the remaining 2 lots in the

amount of $2,400.00. And the Concurrency Review fee in the correct amount, which I can’t provide

since the paperwork and plans never state what the square footage is.

4.         Please change coversheet condition #11 to reflect the City of St. Cloud, not Kissimmee.

5.         Please change coversheet to reflect that side and rear building setbacks should also have the asterisk

to identify the setback if adjacent to residential property as, the rear setback abuts property that is

zoned R-3 and is currently in the development review process.

6.         Please change the trip generations to the 7th edition ITE manual.

7.         The buildings show 25,023 sf but do not show what the s.f. of the second floor for lot 2. The Certificate

of Capacity shows only 0.62 acres for the area which would be 27,007.2 s.f. But the cover sheet shows

194 parking spaces being required instead of 135? Please revise the parking requirement to show the

total square footage of the buildings.

8.         Many large trees are being removed. Staff would support a parking determination to reduce the amount

of parking to preserve these trees.

9.         Please remove all parking spaces from the landscape buffer between lots and increase the landscape

islands where necessary to meet the landscape buffer requirements. This should change the

impervious ratios….

10.        Variances are possible for the landscaping buffers between lots and the buffers do not have the

required landscaping surrounding the parking lots. Preservation of the large trees would be justification

for these variances.

11.        On your site dimension plan, why are you showing the partial dimension of the parking spaces?? (13.5,

14.5, 15, 16 etc???) Please revise to show the required length of 20’.

12.        parking rows on the lot for Building #2 show spaces as being 9 SP @ 9’ = 90. Another shows 7 SP @

7’ = 70’ . Another 6 etc Revise all of these to show @ 10’ since 10’ is the required parking width.

13.        The parking space on the lot for building 3 labeled with 13.5’ needs to have the adjacent parking island

lengthened to protect the vehicle.

14.        Please provide required bicycle parking at 10% of parking

15.        Does a sidewalk exist on Kissimmee Park?

16.        Please outline the timing on the phasing.

17.        Please provide the sign locations

18.        Please provide a cross walk from Building 3 to building 2

19.        A 6’ opaque buffer is required along the rear property line. Screens shall be six feet (6) in height and be

constructed of either finished block, brick, PVC or a berm, including landscaping. Walls shall be

consistent with the style, texture and sizes of other walls on abutting and nearby properties. Finished

block shall consist of a stucco finish, a stone or brick veneer, or stained split face block. Such screens

shall be located on private property no nearer to the property line than one (1) foot. If the abutting

property contains 6’ opaque screening the intent of the screening shall be met, and the additional

screening shall not be required.

20.        Landscaping shall be revised to show trees every 25’ and hedges along the separate lot lines where the

landscaping buffers shall be. Staff reserves the right to rereview the landscaping plans once changes

are made regarding landscaping buffers.

21.        Palms may not count as part of the tree requirement. These must be extras unless a variance is

obtained.

22.        Along property lines parking areas must have 1 canopy tree per 25’ and hedges, please revise.

23.        Please mark that all impervious area shall be sodded.

24.        Would support a BOA variance to reduce side setback between buildings 2 & 3 to save trees

25.        Trees that are being removed must be replaced at a rate of 2:1.

26.        10% of the parking area must be landscaped. Please provide this info.

27.        Please move landscape islands to preserve trees_____

28.        The City Arborist has reviewed the tree survey and determined that it is inaccurate. Please fix and

revise the trees shown on the plans to determine what can be saved. Staff reserves the right to adjust

landscaping comments after the arborist has reviewed the site. Certain trees will be required to be

preserved.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Next time please schedule a pre-application meeting prior to submitting plans. Much of this could have

been avoided.

2.         Recommend resubmittal conditions may change based on potential variances or revisions.

INFORMATION:

1.         Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review. Revised plans submitted after the

allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees. Please be

advised that the number of plans required for submittal has increased to 15 sets.

2.         All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal. Rolled plans will not be accepted.

3.         Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior

to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY (911 ADDRESSING)

CONDITIONS:

1.         Applicant shall clear all proposed street names with the 911 Addressing Department. Please submit

plans for review.

 

FINDING: The DRC recommended a continuance until they have an acceptable plan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10. Case 6-28.01 – First National Bank (Planner, Veronica Witol)

SW Corner 192/Hickory Tree Road

Site Plan

 

Shawn Hindle, with Hanson, Walter and Associates, Inc, was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this site plan.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         A solid waste dumpster with enclosure will need to be provided. We recommend the area next to the

pond at the end of the drive-thru teller. There appears to be a proposed concrete slab on the site plan.

2.         Vertical sides are not allowed along stormwater management ponds. The maximum slope for a dry

system is 2H: 1V.

3.         nverted roads are not allowed. Roads shall be drained by curb and gutter construction.

4.         You will need to contact Osceola County Engineering for permission to construct the driveway along

Hickory Tree Road.

5.         An FDOT driveway connection permit will be required for the proposed driveway connection to US 441-

192.

 

Mr. Hindle questioned that slopes are wanted instead of walls, but if trees are planted could the slopes be kept at 2:1 and bubble the side out and keep the timbers.

 

Mr. Luthie noted that if he did it that way that he could have the slopes.

 

Discussion on the slope and size were discussed.

 

Mr. Hindle noted that the drainage was done by South Florida and that they have their DLT ready and will give those to Mr. Luthie when ready.

 

CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         A Certificate of Capacity approved by City Council shall be required prior to receiving a Notice to

Proceed.

2.         A Sewer Capacity Reservation Fee in the amount of $880.00 shall be paid prior to issuance of a Notice

to Proceed, per Resolution 98-27R. The Sewer Capacity Reservation Fee shall be credited towards the

sewer impact fee at the time of building permit. The balance of all impact and tap fees shall be at the

rate in effect at the time of building permit.

Shaw we will send a letter when we get that request

3.         Please submit legal description in Microsoft Word format prior to being scheduled for a Certificate of

Capacity.

4.         Due to the concurrency levels on Narcoossee Road, please provide documentation from Osceola

County stating what Deminimus impacts on Narcoossee Road are, and that this project is below that

level.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

5.         Staff recommends approval with the above conditions.

INFORMATION:

6.         The Sewer Capacity Reservation Fee equal 10% of the estimated sanitary sewer impact fee. For the

commercial development, this is: 8,000 s.f of building x $1,100 ÷ 1,000 = $8,800 x 10% = $880.00 due

at the Certificate of Capacity. Per Resolution 98-27R.

7.         A list of all impact fees is available from the Planning & Zoning Department upon request.

8.         Please be advised that the Certificate of Capacity will not be moved forward to City Council for approval

until such time as the applicant notifies the Planner that it is needed. Your planner will place the item on

the next available City Council agenda.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         Provide a minimum 12” x 2” tap for the domestic water service.

2.         Change the dog house manhole to a standard structure using PVC couplings to connect to the existing

main.

3.         Identify the sanitary sewer manholes as numbers 45-50 & 45-51.

4.         Re-locate the water meter and backflow preventer from the asphalt area.

5.         Provide a minimum 15’ utility easement centered over the water main to include the fire hydrant and

water meters.

 

Mr. Hindle had a question on the size if it needs to be 11/2” or 2” and if they need to change the service detail.

 

Mr. Mauro and Mr. Hindle discussed the size.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         Before and during construction, when combustibles are brought onto the site in such quantities as

deemed hazardous by the fire official, paved roads to provide access for fire vehicles and a suitable

water supply for fire protection acceptable to the fire department shall be provided and maintained.

(L.D.C. 6.1.21.3)

2.         Fire Hydrants and Fire Protection Appliances shall have clearances of 7.5 feet front and sides and 4

foot to the rear for hydrants. (NFPA1 18.3.4.1)

3.         Fire hydrants in commercial, industrial, and high-density residential areas shall be spaced no greater

than three hundred fifty (350) feet apart and shall be connected to mains no less than eight (8) inches in

diameter. In addition, hydrants shall be located so that the radius of one hundred seventy five (175) feet

from the hydrant shall strike a portion of the structure, as well as strike the same radius of the next

hydrant on the property. The required distance between all hydrants shall be measured along the road

right-of-way and shall not be measured across private property not designated and used as a road rightof-way. No individual hydrant shall be designed to deliver more than 1000 GPM of required fire flow. (L.D.C. 7.9.2.b.1)

4.         Move the hydrant to the southeast parking lot entrance.

 

Mr. Hindle indicated that they did not get any information regarding the sprinklers.

 

Mr. Ennis and Mr. Hindle discussed the fire hydrants on the plans.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1.         The owner will install all primary conduit and concrete transformer pads. The secondary conduit, wire

and terminations are the responsibility of the owner. Please have the conduit installed and inspected by

OUC three weeks before you need pre-power.

2.         A utility easement will be required once the location of the transformer and primary run is determined.

3.         There may be costs for temporary power to this site.

4.         There may be costs to provide electric service to this project. Please contact Development Services.

INFORMATION:

5.         OUC can provide parking lot lights for this project. Please contact Development Services.

6.         Please send all site and electric information to OUC Development Services

44 W. Jefferson Street (407) 236-9652 – Fax (407) 236-9628

P.O. Box 3193 email: developmentservices@ouc.com

Orlando, FL 32802

7.         Once all information is obtained by Development Services an Engineer will be assigned to the project.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         There appear to be several access points on adjacent property. These will need to be recorded

easements. Please show these within the proposed easements to be recorded on the site. Recording

information shall be included on the site plan including OR Book and Page Number prior to sign off.

2.         Will both accesses be constructed with this site plan?

3.         Only one freestanding sign is allowed per parcel. Site has an existing billboard sign.

4.         Billboard sign must be removed prior to Notice to Proceed.

5.         Please provide letter from Osceola County stating right-of-way is sufficient.

6.         The paved area shall contain a 10% landscaping buffer. Please provide table showing this.

7.         Buffer the access roads with trees. When it is determined what is going there. A signed document is

required

8.         Please include a bypass lane in the drive thru area with no overhang.

 

Mr. Hindle indicated that the access points are for future access to other sites to the south.  He noted that they are putting in cross access easements.  He also noted that the ponds are impounding.  The water table is already 3 feet deep, we have requested from the neighboring property owners and they allowed us to back slope.

 

Mr. Hindle and Mr. Luthie discussed the slope.

 

Mr. Hindle indicated to Mr. Mauro that he didn’t put this information on the plans but the developer would like for them to use a 10 inch pipe instead of an 8 inch and they also want me to add another manhole.  He questioned if this would be alright.

 

There was discussion on manholes and pipes and Mr. Mauro had no problem with using a 10 inch pipe.

 

There was discussion on the lift station and Mr. Mauro indicated that they may not be able to tie into the lift station.

 

Mr. Hindle also indicated that they would like to shift their access.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that they would need to go through DOT.

 

Mr. Hindle responded that they have requested but are waiting for DOT to get back with them.

 

Mr. Hindle wanted to know if an inverted crown was alright. 

 

Mr. Luthie indicated that the water would need to drain but he wants to see the master plan.

 

Mr. Hindle noted that the billboard is the only thing in concrete and it will be removed before we request a new sign.

 

INFORMATION:

1.         Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review. Revised plans submitted after the

allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees. Please be

advised that the number of plans required for submittal has increased to 15 sets.

2.         All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal. Rolled plans will not be accepted.

3.         Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior

to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         This project will require review by the City Engineering Department only.

 

FINDING:  The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11. Case #4-73.08 – Pinewood Gardens (Planner, Veronica Witol)

Mutter Road

Re-Use Credit Request

 

Jeremy Kibler, with Real Deal Development Group, was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this request.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         The request for a re-use credit is denied. The City has discontinued credits on all projects without a prior

agreement, due to the expansion of the reclaimed area to the entire Chapter 180 Utility Service Area,

requiring a reclaimed water system installation for sewer service and/or irrigation water supply.

 

Mr. Mauro indicated that we no longer issue re-use credits.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that they have two options, to go to City Council or withdraw and only lose 10% for administrative fees.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         The District has no comment.

 

FINDING:  The DRC recommended Denial.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12. Case #6-31.00 – The Exchange (North & South) (Planner, Jeff Higgins)

South side of Kissimmee Park Rd/Old Canoe Creek Rd

Annexation & Zoning

 

Jeremy Kibler, with Real Deal Development Group, was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this annexation/zoning.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         Water and sewer are available. Extensions may be required.

2.         The wastewater discharge will go to the SSWWTP.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         Upon annexation, this site will receive fire protection from the St. Cloud Fire Rescue Department. In

order for the site to receive the ISO rating inherent with the rest of the City, a hydrant must be located

within 1000 feet of any existing structures. Furthermore, any future development will require standards

set forth according to the City of St. Cloud’s Land Development Code.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Approval of annexation, Highway Business zoning, and R-3 zoning.

 

INFORMATION:

1.             Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         The District has no comment.

 

Mr. Kibler wanted to know when this would be going to Planning Board.

 

Mr. Higgins noted that it may be January 24th.

 

Mr. Nearing suggested that Mr. Kibler call Mr. Higgins to firm up the date.

 

FINDING: The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13. Case #6-32.01 – The Exchange North (Planner, Jeff Higgins)

South side of Kissimmee Park Rd/Old Canoe Creek Rd

Land Use Amendment

 

Jeremy Kibler, with Real Deal Development Group, was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this LUA.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Further conditions and recommendations will be addressed during the construction process.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Approval of Medium Density Residential Large Scale Land Use Amendment.

INFORMATION:

2.         Please include the Residential Land Use Application Fiscal Impact Analysis accessed via the planning &

zoning webpage:

http://www.stcloud.org/documents/Planning%20and%20Zoning/Checklists/Residential%20Land%20Use

%20Checklist.pdf

 

Mr. Nearing noted that we only have one large scale submittal per year and that he has made the timing.

 

Mr. Higgins indicated that he also needs to include a Fiscal Impact Analysis Model.

 

Mr. Kibler noted that he had done that but he has another copy that Mr. Higgins could have.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         The District has no comment.

 

FINDING:  The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14. Case #6-32.02 – The Exchange South (Planner, Jeff Higgins)

South side of Kissimmee Park Rd/Old Canoe Creek Rd

Land Use Amendment

 

Jeremy Kibler, with Real Deal Development Group, was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this LUA

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Further conditions and recommendations will be addressed during the construction process.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Approval of Commercial Large Scale Land Use Amendment.

INFORMATION:

2.         Please include the Nonresidential Land Use Application Fiscal Impact Analysis accessed via the

planning & zoning checklists:

http://www.stcloud.org/documents/Planning%20and%20Zoning/Checklists/Commercial%20Land%20Us

e%20Checklist.pdf

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         The District has no comment.

 

FINDING: The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15. Case #6-26.01 – Villages of Kissimmee Park North (Planner, John Groenendaal)

Northeast Corner of Kissimmee Park Rd/W New Nolte Rd

Land Use Amendment & Rezoning

Jeremy Kibler, with Real Deal Development Group, was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this LUA/rezoning.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Further conditions and recommendations will be addressed during the construction process.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         The requested land use to MDR and zoning of R-3 are appropriate.

2.         Requesting the R-3 Town home conditions which are as follows:

3.         Apartment style multifamily development shall be prohibited.

4.         Any residential development shall be of fee simple ownership.

5.         The height of all structures on the subject property shall be limited to a maximum of 28 feet. No

structure shall contain more than 2 Stories.

6.         The community will have landscaping maintained communally.

7.         If the property owner is unable to develop the subject property with these conditions then the

property owner will rezone to PUD.

8.         Townhouses shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width.

9.         A privacy area behind each unit will be created, with a 6 foot fence that extends 6 feet

perpendicular to the townhomes.

10.        A pre application meeting on the PSP shall be required for tree preservation.

INFORMATION:

1.         Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review. Revised plans submitted after the

allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees. Please be

advised that the number of plans required for submittal has increased to 15 sets.

2.         All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal. Rolled plans will not be accepted.

3.         Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior

to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

Mr. Kibler wanted to know when the pre-application would be set up.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that he needs to call John Groenendaal next week and to also make sure that Kim Duffy is available.  He also wanted to know if they had a concept plan.

 

Mr. Kibler noted that they do not.

 

Mr. Nearing suggested that they put something together when they meet.  He has a strong suspicion that the multi family will probably go first.  He also noted that when Mr. Kibler walks the site with Mr. Groenendall and Ms. Duffy that they have a tree survey so they can have a feeling for what is out there and maybe some change can be done because we could entertain the thought of a variance to save some trees over parking spaces.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         The District has no comment.

 

FINDING: The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16. Case #6-27.01 – Villages of Kissimmee Park South (HB) (Planner, John Groenendaal)

Northeast Corner of Kissimmee Park Rd/W New Nolte Rd

Rezoning

 

Jeremy Kibler, with Real Deal Development Group, was present to represent the application.

 

Mr. Nearing questioned the Highway Business.  He wanted to know if Mr. Kibler was aware that this may have some problems with City Council.

 

Mr. Kibler indicated he knew there was a problem with gas stations.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that he was correct and suggested that Mr. Kibler volunteer excluding uses before he went to council.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this Rezoning.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

Mr. Mauro noted that there was only one sewer line there.

 

Mr. Kibler questioned if it extended to the ROW.

 

Mr. Mauro noted that they would need to look at the alignment.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Further conditions and recommendations will be addressed during the construction process.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         Up zoning to HB at the corner of West New Nolte Road and Kissimmee Park Road is appropriate.

INFORMATION:

1.         Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review. Revised plans submitted after the

allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees. Please be

advised that the number of plans required for submittal has increased to 15 sets.

2.         All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal. Rolled plans will not be accepted.

3.         Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior

to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         The District has no comment.

 

FINDING: The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

17. Case #6-27.02 – Villages of Kissimmee Park South (R-3) (Planner, John Groenendaal)

Northeast Corner of Kissimmee Park Rd/W New Nolte Rd

Rezoning

 

Jeremy Kibler, with Real Deal Development Group, was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this rezoning

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Further conditions and recommendations will be addressed during the construction process.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         The requested land use to MDR and zoning of R-3 are appropriate.

2.         Requesting the R-3 Town home conditions which are as follows:

3.         Apartment style multifamily development shall be prohibited.

4.         Any residential development shall be of fee simple ownership.

5.         The height of all structures on the subject property shall be limited to a maximum of 28 feet. No

structure shall contain more than 2 stories.

6.         The community will have landscaping maintained communally.

7.         If the property owner is unable to develop the subject property with these conditions then the

property owner will rezone to PUD.

8.         Townhouses shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width.

9.         A privacy area behind each unit will be created, with a 6 foot fence that extends 6 feet

perpendicular to the townhomes.

10.        A pre application meeting on the PSP shall be required for tree preservation.

INFORMATION:

1.         Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior

to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1. The District has no comment.

 

FINDING: The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18. Case #6-27.03 – Villages of Kissimmee Park South (LUA) (Planner, John Groenendaal)

Northeast Corner of Kissimmee Park Rd/W New Nolte Rd

Land Use Amendment

 

Jeremy Kibler, with Real Deal Development Group, was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this LUA.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Further conditions and recommendations will be addressed during the construction process.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         The requested land use to MDR and zoning of R-3 are appropriate.

2.         Requesting the R-3 Town home conditions which are as follows:

3.         Apartment style multifamily development shall be prohibited.

4.         Any residential development shall be of fee simple ownership.

5.         The height of all structures on the subject property shall be limited to a maximum of 28 feet. No

structure shall contain more than 2 stories.

6.         The community will have landscaping maintained communally.

7.         If the property owner is unable to develop the subject property with these conditions then the

property owner will rezone to PUD.

8.         Townhouses shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width.

9.         A privacy area behind each unit will be created, with a 6 foot fence that extends 6 feet

perpendicular to the townhomes.

10.        A pre application meeting on the PSP shall be required for tree preservation.

INFORMATION:

1.         Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior

to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         The District has no comments.

 

FINDING: The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19. Case #4-31.08 – Oak Ridge (fka Lorenz Estates) (Planner, John Groenendaal)

NW Corner Canoe Creek Rd/Old Canoe Creek Rd

Re-Use Credit Request

 

Jeremy Kibler, with Real Deal Development Group, was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this request.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         If the rate for apartments reclaimed is $450.00 then the application is appropriate.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         The request for a re-use credit is denied. The City has discontinued credits on all projects without a prior

agreement, due to the expansion of the reclaimed area to the entire Chapter 180 Utility Service Area,

requiring a reclaimed water system installation for sewer service and/or irrigation water supply.

 

Mr. Mauro noted that this would be denied.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that he had the same alternatives as before.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         The District has no comment.

 

FINDING:  The DRC recommended Denial.

 

ADJOURNMENT:  The meeting was adjourned at 3:06 pm