Homepage -Family

Go To Search
TwitterFacebook
YouTube
 

View Other Items in this Archive | View All Archives | Printable Version

CITY OF ST. CLOUD

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES

 

DATE OF MEETING:      January 12, 2006

 

LOCATION:                   1300 9th Street - 1st Floor – DRC Conference Room; St. Cloud

 

CALL TO ORDER:         2:00 P.M.

 

CHAIRMAN:                  David Nearing, Planning and Zoning Director

 

SECRETARY:               Michelle Orton, DRC Secretary

 

MEMBERS PRESENT:

Lt. Bret Dunn                 John Yallaly                   Michele Bronson            Jeffrey Higgins              

Bill Johnston                  Bob Friend                    John Groenendaal          Veronica Witol  

Neil Newman    

 

NEW BUSINESS:

 

1.         Case #6-35.01 – Sawyer Estates (Planner, Jeff Higgins)

W. New Nolte & Kissimmee Park Roads

Annexation/LUA/Zoning

 

Lt. Bret Dunn, was present to speak to the committee on behalf of Chief Kelly with the City of St. Cloud Police Department.

 

Lt. Dunn indicated that the City Police Chief and staff recommend approval on the condition that the City budget for a new police officer.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that according to the outcome of the FIAM (Fiscal Impact Analysis Model) that it will cost law enforcement the value of an officer and in 2014 it will need up to 2 officers.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this Annexation.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         A utility easement for the water and sewer mains and services will be required.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         Upon annexation, this site will receive fire protection from the St. Cloud Fire Rescue Department. In

order for the site to receive the ISO rating inherent with the rest of the City, a hydrant must be located

within 1000 feet of any existing structures. Furthermore, any future development will require standards

set forth according to the City of St. Cloud’s Land Development Code.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

PLANNING

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Approval of annexation, R-3 zoning, and Medium Density Residential Land Use.

INFORMATION:

2.         Creation of an enclave would prohibit voluntary annexation of property to the south.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

CONDITIONS:

1.         The District has no comment regarding this case.

 

FINDING:

The DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.                   Case #3-16.15 – Indian Lakes, Phase 7 (Planner, Veronica Witol)

Canoe Creek Road

Final Plat

 

Jesse Swords with Greater Homes and Rocky Carson with Donald McIntosh were present to represent the application.

 

Mr. Swords wanted to know when they would be able to move forward to Planning Board.

 

Ms. Witol indicated that they would need a set of plans so that the committee could sign off on them and then would need 15 reduced sets.  As soon as this is completed then they would be able to be placed on the Planning Board agenda.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1. No comments on this final plat.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1. No comments.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1. No comments.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1. Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1. The final plat meets the requirements of The Orlando Utilities Commission Electric Engineering Division.

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1. Please send all future DRC agenda submittals to Marty Hobbs attention, not the planner you think will

be assigned the case. This application barely missed being on the agenda, as it was added to my other

Indian lakes files and was caught just in time.

2. Please mark any future applications as having an R-1B zoning, not PD.

3. Our Department policy regarding the recording of plats has changed. Please come to the Department

of Planning and Zoning for a copy of the checklist or you may download it at www.stcloud.org.

4. Please submit an electronic version of this plat. Auto-Cad files are acceptable.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. Recommend approval with conditions

INFORMATION:

1. Our plat process has changed. Please submit 1 full size copy of the plat with all DRC corrections.

Once DRC signs off on this plan, you will be contacted to submit 15 reduced copies (11 x 17) of plat

prior to being scheduled for Planning Board.

2. Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review. Revised plans submitted after the

allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees. Please be

advised that the number of plans required for submittal has increased to 15 sets.

3. All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal. Rolled plans will not be accepted.

4. Effective immediately, all residential and commercial developments approved (issuance of a “Notice to

Proceed” shall constitute approval) after December 15, 2005 shall be assessed a “CyberSpot Capital

Expansion” charge due and payable prior to issuance of a “Notice to Proceed” for the development.

This fee shall be assessed as follows:

Per Residential Unit: $118.46

Per square foot of Commercial property: $0.0068

Please reference Resolution #2005-418R, Ordinance #2005-168, and Section 6.1.10.1 of the

Land Development Code.

 

Mr. Carson wanted to know what “Notice to Proceed” meant as far as the Cyber Spot.  Would they need to pay for this before they were issued their Notice to Proceed.

 

Ms. Witol indicated that the department is not issuing a notice to proceed until they get a sign off from Ms. Hobbs but they would still need to pay.

 

Ms. Hobbs noted that she is not responsible for the notice to proceed.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that for a final plat a Notice to Proceed is not issued only when someone comes in for a pre-con.  He also noted that they will remove this condition that they have already passed the jeopardy point. 

 

Ms. Witol wanted them to know that when they submit information that they need to submit it to the attention of Ms. Hobbs because if they don’t it may be missed.

 

Mr. Swords wanted to know when the Cyber Spot would be available.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that to his understanding it should be sometime in February subject to the availability of parts.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

CONDITIONS:

1. The District has no comment regarding this case.

 

FINDING:  

The DRC recommends approval with conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.                   Case #5-82.03 – McKay Street Townhomes #1 (Planner, John Groenendaal)

McKay Street; between 10th & 5th Streets

                                                            PSP/Final Construction Plans (2nd Review)

 

No one was present to represent the application.

 

Mr. Groenendaal recommended denial with the committee agreeing.

 

Bruce Taylor with Stottler, Stagg and Associates came in late to represent the application.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that they had already denied the case.  That Mr. Taylor would need to get together with Mr. Groenendaal to find out why he made that recommendation.

 

Mr. Groenendaal noted that he would need to resubmit and pay the fees.

 

Mr. Taylor questioned why he would need to resubmit that he has a new layout that he would like for Mr. Groenendaal to look at. 

 

Mr. Groenendaal noted that he would look at if afterwards but that he would need to still reapply.

 

Mr. Taylor indicated that he would do that.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that this involved making a new application and getting back into the process.

 

Mr. Taylor wanted to know how this will affect Phase 2.

 

Mr. Groenendaal noted that Mr. Taylor still needs to bring in a Certificate of Title.

 

Mr. Taylor wanted to know if he needed a new application.

 

Mr. Groenendaal indicated that he needs a new application for Phase 1 and a new Certificate of Title for Phase 2 land use.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that it has to go through for land use and zoning and that those can be done concurrently while reviewing a plan.  He also noted that when the Planning Department gets notice from DCA that the amendment was okay then it can be signed off.

 

Mr. Taylor wanted to know when the next deadline is.

 

Ms. Hobbs indicated that it is on February 23rd.

 

Mr. Taylor noted that he will incorporate the comments and try to get that in by the next deadline.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on these construction plans..

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         The developer will need to dedicate R/W along the McKay frontage to create a minimum half section of

25’ to meet local street standard width requirements.

2.         Under drains will be required unless a soils report and field conditions determine that the seasonal high

water table is sufficiently separated from the road subgrade.

3.         The proposed roadway will be maintained by the HOA.

4.         An Osceola County R/W utilization permit for work within McKay St. will need to be obtained prior to a

request for a pre-construction meeting and issuance of a “Notice to proceed” for construction of this

project.

5.         Please explain the design and reasoning for the ¼” steel plating to cover the drainage flumes.

6.         Please eliminate the trench grating across the roadway. A storm grate matching the width of curb will

perform much better over the long term. Trench grates have a tendency to fail and/or cause tripping

hazards when the grates flip up due to traffic impact loads.

7.         Solid waste carts (designed for townhomes) will be provided for each unit. No green carts for vegetation

will be provided.

 

CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         The Sewer Impact Reservation Fee $3,537.00amount equal to 10% of required sewer impact fee, is

required prior to issuance of Notice to Proceed.

2.         The Sewer Impact Reservation Fee shall be credited towards the sewer impact fee for each residential

dwelling unit at the time of building permit at the rate of $235.80 per lot. The balance of the sewer

impact fee and all other impact and tap fees are due and payable at the time of Building Permit on a lot

by lot basis.

INFORMATION:

1.         The Sewer Impact Reservation Fee is calculated as 10% of the estimated sewer impact fee for the

development, according to Resolution 98-27R. The estimated sewer impact fee for the project is $2,358

per dwelling unit. 15 dwelling units x $2,358 = $35,370.00 x 10% = $3,537.00.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         Provide an 8”x6” Tee and show connection to the 6” stub-out at STA 14+45, on plan and profile.

2.         Show a Tee and Gate Valve for the future connection to the 8” water main.

3.         Provide a Water Hydraulic Analysis Report.

4.         Provide a Sewer Hydraulic Analysis Report.

5.         Show the jumper location and all water sample point locations on the off-site main.

6.         Provide a sanitary sewer clean-out on the southern lateral to building no. 2.

7.         The 6” sanitary sewer main will be required to be changed to an 8” main with a manhole structure

placed on each end.

8.         Change the size of the water meter to the lift station to a ¾” meter.

9.         Provide an easement for the off-site sanitary sewer main.

10.        All existing wells and septic tanks will require proper abandonment, per Osceola County Health

Department Standards.

11.        A minimum 15 foot easement will be required, centered over the water main, meters and hydrants.

12.        A minimum 20 foot easement will be required, centered over the sewer main and service laterals.

13.        Change the PVC on the 2” service lines to, P.E. Tubing.

14.        The lift station easement size does not meet the minimum requirements.

15.        Show existing 8” gate valve at the blow-off along McKay Street, remove tapping sleeve and valve and

show connection to existing blow-off.

16.        Change the DIP on the gravity connection to the lift station to PVC, as noted on detail sheets.

17.        Provide a 1’=20’ lift station Site Plan Detail.

18.        Indicate East stub-out with elevation on manhole no. 25-3.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         Before and during construction, when combustibles are brought onto the site in such quantities as

deemed hazardous by the fire official, paved roads to provide access for fire vehicles and a suitable

water supply for fire protection acceptable to the fire department shall be provided and maintained.

(L.D.C. 6.1.21.3)

2.         This project includes an approximately 6980-sq. ft. building. The estimated fire flow for this building is

2000 GPM. In accordance with 7.9.2.2 of the Land Development Code, water distribution systems

and/or main extensions shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the fire protection

requirements of the Insurance Services Office, as stated in their publication “Guide for Determination of

Required Fire Flows”. Proof of adequate fire flow must be submitted to the public works department for

verification prior to site plan approval by the fire rescue department.

3.         Fire Hydrants and Fire Protection Appliances shall have clearances of 7.5 feet front and sides and 4

foot to the rear for hydrants. (NFPA1 18.3.4.1)

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1.         The owner shall install all primary conduit, concrete transformer pads and secondary pullboxes. The

secondary conduit, wire and terminations will be the responsibility of the owner. Please have all conduit

and pads installed and passed inspection by OUC three weeks before you need electric power.

2.         A utility easement will be required for transformers and primary electric.

3.         There may be costs for temporary power to this site.

4.         There may be costs to provide electric service to this project. Please contact Development Services.

 

INFORMATION:

5.         OUC can provide parking lot lighting for this project. Please contact Development Services.

6.         Please send all site and electric information to OUC Development Services

44 W. Jefferson Street (407) 236-9652 – Fax (407) 236-9628

PO Box 3193 email: developmentservices@ouc.com

Orlando, FL 32802

7.         Once all information is obtained by Development Services and engineer will be assigned to the project.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         Contact 911/Addressing for street name(s) and provide the City with their approval memo.

2.         Provide a preliminary plat with all dedications proposed

3.         Show the front elevation. (Front Elevations should be offset to create shadow and to avoid monotony.)

4.         A six foot high and wide wood or PVC partition shall separate the rear yard area to give some privacy.

5.         Your landscape buffers against LDR are inadequate, Code requires a 30 foot buffer and an A

screen. Section 8.7.3 outlines these requirements.

6.         Effective immediately, all residential and commercial developments approved (issuance of a “Notice

to Proceed” shall constitute approval) after December 15, 2005 shall be assessed a “CyberSpot

Capital Expansion” charge due and payable prior to issuance of a “Notice to Proceed” for the

development. This fee shall be assessed as follows:

Per Residential Unit: $118.46

Per square foot of Commercial property: $0.0068

Please reference Resolution #2005-418R, Ordinance #2005-168, and Section 6.1.10.1 of the

Land Development Code.

INFORMATION:

1.         Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review. Revised plans submitted after the

allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees. Please be

advised that the number of plans required for submittal has increased to 15 sets.

2.         All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal. Rolled plans will not be accepted.

3.         Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior

to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

CONDITIONS:

1.         This project will require review by the City Engineering Department only.

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY (911 ADDRESSING)

CONDITIONS:

1.         Please submit preliminary plat for street name review and approval to the 9-1-1 Addressing Department.

 

FINDING: 

The DRC recommended denial, applicant must resubmit with new application

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.                   Case #5-36.05 – Gramercy Farms (Planner, Veronica Witol)

3050 Old Hickory Tree Road

PUD Final Master Plan

 

Kevin Rainey with Dufresne-Henry Inc. and Jeremy Camp with KB Homes were present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this master plan.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         All tree plantings within the R/W will need to be the type with a root system which will not impact the

sidewalks, curbs, and street systems.

2.         A R/W utilization permit will need to be obtained from Osceola County for utilization of Packard Ave. and

Old Hickory Tree Road. Permits or a letter of intent to permit the proposed improvements will need to

be obtained prior to the request for a pre-construction meeting and issuance of a “notice to proceed” for

the project.

3.         The roundabout feature will need to be maintained by the HOA. Please describe the material and

architectural features of the roundabout.

 

Mr. Rainey indicated that the features would probably be benches.  Mr. Rainey wanted to know if they would need to put this into a tract.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that they would need to put in a tract for the roundabout.

 

Mr. Rainey indicated that they were made up of pavement and that the curb is an 8 foot lane of pavers which is called a truck roll over.  The buffer interior will be landscaping.  Mr. Rainey also wanted to know if the department wanted the pavers in the tract instead of the right of way.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that they do.

 

Mr. Rainey noted that it will be where the tract starts.

 

4.         Please label each lot on the master grading plan as either a type A or type B grade for quick reference.

5.         Sufficient width will need to be provided for all drainage easements in order to provide adequate

working space for future maintenance of the underground pipes. Typically for every vertical foot of depth

to invert 2 horizontal feet of width will be necessary. As an example a pipe depth to invert of 10’ will

require a minimum 20’ wide drainage easement.

 

Mr. Rainey wanted to know if there was a list of acceptable trees.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that this is currently being worked on, that Mr. Luthie suggested to the committee that a list be made up of acceptable trees.  Mr. Nearing then indicated that the Parks and Recreation arborist is currently out of the country but when she gets back we will be able to get a list showing species and cultivars.

 

CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         A Certificate of Capacity approved by City Council shall be required prior to receiving a Notice to

Proceed.

2.         The plans show only 977 units, the concurrency application states 989. The Certificate of Capacity will

be processed with 977 units, unless reasoning is provided for 989.

 

Mr. Rainey indicated that the correct amount is 977 units.

 

3.         A Sewer Capacity Reservation Fee in the amount of $230,376.60 shall be paid prior to issuance of a

Notice to Proceed, per Resolution 98-27R. The Sewer Capacity Reservation Fee shall be credited

towards the sewer impact fee at the time of building permit. The balance of all impact and tap fees shall

be at the rate in effect at the time of building permit.

4.         Due to the concurrency levels on Narcoossee Road, please provide documentation from Osceola

County stating what improvements or contributions etc., are necessary for road concurrency on this

project.

INFORMATION:

1.         Please be advised that the Certificate of Capacity will not be moved forward to City Council for approval

until such time as the applicant notifies the Planner that it is needed. Your planner will place the item on

the next available City Council agenda.

2.         The Sewer Capacity Reservation Fee equal 10% of the estimated sanitary sewer impact fee. For the

residential development, this is: 977 dwelling units x $2,358 = $2,303,766 x 10% = $230,376.60 due at

the Certificate of Capacity. Per Resolution 98-27R.

 

Mr. Rainey indicated that they were checking on the capacity.

 

3.         A list of all impact fees is available from the Planning & Zoning Department upon request.

 

Mr. Rainey wanted to know about water services for the townhomes, he questioned if they will be individual meters, one per lot or per each unit.

 

Mr. Nearing questioned the lot width.

 

Mr. Camp noted that they would prefer to put the meters in the front.

 

Mr. Yallaly indicated that by the time construction is complete the city will have the automatic reading meter and it will allow the city to read it remotely.

 

Mr. Camp then noted that the location is not critical then.

 

Mr. Yallaly again indicated that it will be a remote reading.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         Sheet No.34, increase the size of the water main from 4” to 12”, and extend to Old Hickory Tree Rd.

with a TEE and 3 valves and across the entire frontage (north to south) and tie into main at front

entrance.

2.         Sheet No.34, increase the size of the water main from 4” to 8” and loop between STA 13+35 to STA

17+00.

3.         Show all required water services to town homes. Service can be a master meter.

4.         Provide a minimum of 3 gate valves at each Tee on the water and reclaimed water mains.

5.         Sheet No.36, provide an 8” water main from STA 32+00 to 33+18 & 11+05 to 09+80 and terminate with

a gate valve and blow-off at the property line.

6.         Sheet No.37, re-design the sanitary sewer system so the manhole structure no. 40 does not fall within

the round-a bout.

7.         Sheet No.39, increase the size of the water main from 8” to 12” between STA 13+30 & 16+35.

8.         Sheet No.44, Increase the size of the reclaimed water main from a 4” & 6” to 8” between STA 10+20 to

16+20, and terminate with a gate valve and blow-off at the right of way line.

9.         Sheet No.45, re-design the sanitary sewer system so the manhole structure no. 2 does not fall within

the island.

10.        Sheet No.45, remove all water and reclaimed water valves from the island area.

11.        Sheet No.45, add a gate valve and a blow-off on the water and reclaimed water main stub-outs for

future connection locations.

12.        Sheet No.45, change the size of the force main to a 20” main up to the wye connection increasing to a

24” from that point.

13.        Sheet No.’s 45 & 46, remove wording “by others” on the force main.

14.        Sheet No.’s 45, 46 & 47, add a gate valve every 1,000LF on the force main.

15.        Sheet No.46, add a blow-off to the gate valves on the stub-outs for future connection.

16.        Please number the lift station as no. 83 and begin the manhole numbering with 83-01.

17.        This project will include the construction of the entire force main with the City providing a cost share for

the upgrade.

18.        The location of the 20” force main to the lift station site has not been finalized and will not be required at

this time, however, it will be subject to approval at time of submittal of the construction plans. The

engineer will need to meet with the City to finalize agreement.

 

 

Mr. Rainey noted that there were a lot of conditions on the line division.  A lot of these are construction, he wanted to know if he needed these for the master plan.

 

Ms. Witol noted that if he completes the conditions it would help.

 

Mr. Rainey noted that on condition #13 where is says, “remove by others” that they will fix those things.  He was concerned with all other valves and the blow offs that they were in the right spot.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that the main intent is to show where the utilities and easements are located.

 

Mr. Yallaly noted that Mr. Rainey needs to show the size.

 

Discussion on valve sizes took place between Mr. Rainey and Mr. Yallaly.

 

Mr. Yallaly noted that the force main needs to be on the final construction plans and everything else is fairly minor.

 

Mr. Camp wanted to know if there was a schedule for public meetings.

 

Ms. Hobbs noted that it depended when all of the information needed was submitted and then a date would be supplied by the planner.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         Add hydrants at lots 542 , 236, 452, 453, 43, on page 34 at the blow-off near town houses, and at the

12” mains between buildings on page 35 and 36.

2.         All gates shall be located a minimum of 30’ (thirty feet) from the public right of way and shall not open

outward.

3.         All gates shall have an access control device approved by the Fire Rescue Department. (NFPA 1

10.12.2)

 

Mr. Rainey wanted to know if this was standard note.

 

Mr. Johnston noted that he did not see a gate entry.

 

Mr. Rainey indicated that there are two access points and no gates.

 

4.         Cul-de sacs with no street parking shall be provided with a turnaround having an outside roadway

diameter of at least one hundred feet (100’) and a street right of way diameter of one hundred twenty

feet (120’). Cul-de-sacs shall have a maximum length of eight hundred feet (800’) including the turn

around. (LDC 6.2.1L)

5.         Before and during construction, when combustibles are brought onto the site in such quantities as

deemed hazardous by the fire official, paved roads to provide access for fire vehicles and a suitable

water supply for fire protection acceptable to the fire department shall be provided and maintained.

(L.D.C. 6.1.21.3)

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1.         The owner shall install all primary conduit, primary manholes or pullboxes, concrete switchgear pads,

concrete transformer pads and secondary pullboxes required to provide service to this project. Please

have all conduit and pads installed and passed inspection by OUC three weeks before you need electric

power.

2.         A ten foot (10’) utility easement will be required on all property lines abutting a right-of-way. Other

easements may be required.

3.         There may be costs for temporary power to this site.

4.         There may be costs to provide electric service to this project. Please contact Development Services.

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         Please pay past monies due on the R-O-W abandonment, $88.11, and zoning, $85.44.

2.         On aerial and arbor plan, show how many scrub oaks and wax myrtles are to be removed, and their

sizes.

3.         Show the phasing line and time line of phasing

4.         Are any of the single family attached supposed to have the rear alley access? If so their access was to

be a tract and not an easement, I don’t see either on the final master plan,

 

Mr. Rainey noted that they do not anticipate rear problems at this time and they are just utility easements and not right of way easements.

 

Mr. Nearing requested that they identify them as utility easements on the plans.

 

5.         The PUD ordinance did not include signage regulations; therefore, you must abide by the LDC. 12’

stone columns with an arched sign over the entry does not abide by our LDC. A PUD text amendment

would be required to allow this.

 

Mr. Rainey wanted to know if they showed the stone columns and the arch on the constructions plans would that be the only ones they would need to show it on.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that they would need to be seen on the PUD amendment.

 

Mr. Groenendaal noted that it should have been part of the PUD.

 

Mr. Rainey wanted to know if he needed a text amendment.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that he only needs to show the location.  He also noted to Mr. Rainey that he would need a sign permit and that would need to be separate.

 

Mr. Rainey wanted to know if he was putting up additional signage if he needs to show it on the plan.  He also questioned if he needed to show gazebos or pavilions, and if they need to show up on the master plan.

 

Ms. Witol wanted to know if this was random or part of the parks.

 

Mr. Rainey noted that they would be in the round about and in the parks.

 

Ms. Witol indicated she didn’t have a problem with this.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that the master plans show the roads and that he can put the parks on the construction plans.

 

Mr. Rainey then indicated that they can show the infrastructure on the construction plans for the parks.

 

Ms. Witol noted she wasn’t sure what they were doing.

 

Mr. Rainey indicated that this was for landscaping, sidewalks, tot lots and gazebos.

 

Ms. Witol noted that this would need to be a site plan.

 

Mr. Rainey wanted to know if they could be included in the construction plans.

 

Mr. Camp noted that he too would like to keep everything together.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that the Planning Department would need a site plan with the appropriate scale.

 

Ms. Witol noted that they could apply at the same time and that the site plan could be approved before the construction plans.

 

Mr. Camp indicated that would be fine.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that they could do it as a minor since it was a little area.

 

Mr. Camp indicated that he would like to do it all at once so it can all be approved at the same time.

 

Mr. Nearing wanted to know if they would have a trail system.

 

Mr. Camp noted that they would not, they would have walkways, sidewalks and bike lanes.

 

6.         Please show sign location on page 4 of the final master plan, not just the landscaping plan

7.         Original condition was: The applicant shall incorporate pedestrian easements into the final master plan

to promote interconnectivity between the surrounding properties and the 24 acre park., Is the 5’

concrete sidewalk bordering wetland “A” the only place where there will be an easement? Please show

these as having easements also,

 

Mr. Rainey indicated that the sidewalk system was on the roadway to Packard Avenue and then the sidewalk would run along the SLIC ROW to Hickory Tree and the Davis Parcel.

 

There was discussion on the sidewalk.

 

8.         Please attach landscaping plan to final master plan.

9.         Please include additional enlarged view sheets of all areas that are landscaped, including along

Packard Avenue.

10.        Please change Crape Myrtle’s to be standard.

11.        Please change the species of the understory trees along Packard and southern property line to be the

medium height trees like the crape myrtle that was used. 24” min. height does not meet the requirement

of a minimum height of 6’ upon planting.

 

Mr. Rainey indicated that the Planning Department had changed the species.  He noted that they have 3 sections of trees, the Crape Myrtle and the Understory trees.

 

Ms. Witol indicated that shown on the plans they were alternating the Crate Myrtle with the other one and they also show them at 24 inches and the Crape Myrtle at 10 feet.  She noted that if they look at the schedule that 24 inches will not work.

 

Mr. Rainey noted that Ms. Witol must have received conflicting information.

 

Mr. Rainey and Ms. Witol checked the plans and discussed the different sizes.

 

Ms. Witol noted that the correct information would need to be submitted in order for them to show correct minimum height.

 

12.        Along Old Hickory Tree requires a Type A screen which requires opaque to a height of 6’. There

appears to be a wall or fence here on pages L6 and L7, but it is not identified. Please identify it, or

since it appears that plants are being used for the Buffer, please provide a rendering of how the plants

will look at planting and again at maturity.

13.        Please wrap landscaping around the southern part of sheet L7 like you did for L6

14.        Platanus occidentalis, sycamore, is not shown on tree schedule.

 

Mr. Rainey noted that they will not be using Sycamore anywhere but that it’s an available option.

 

Ms. Witol indicated that they did not show that.

 

Mr. Rainey noted that they were not installing the tree but that the homeowner has that one available to them.  In the PUD they are required to put one tree on each lot.

 

Ms. Witol wanted to know that if that was the case that the counts of trees were all road and buffer trees.

 

Mr. Rainey affirmed that was correct.  The yard trees are not counted on the plans.

 

Ms. Witol noted that she would like to have all of the trees shown on the count.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that they should show on the plans the minimum size and width of trees.

 

Ms. Witol agreed and wanted it known that she did not want them to install a 3 foot tree and think that would be alright.

15.        Can we extend the landscaping as shown on the main boulevard all the way to Packard?

16.        Every page of the landscaping plan (besides the overall plan) shows notes that each lot will have a tree

in the front yard. This is more than what was required in the PUD ordinance, is this intended?

17.        Please include on the overall master plan a comment that everything will be sodded and the front yard

tree comments, since not every area has an enlarged view.

 

Mr. Rainey indicated that the comment says, “everything will be sodded” he wanted to know what was meant by “everything”

 

Ms. Witol noted that she wants to know which areas will not have sod.

 

Mr. Rainey indicated that only those areas that will have mulch.

 

Ms. Witol noted that on the plans it wasn’t large enough to view.

 

Mr. Rainey indicated that they will add those sheets and show everything involved.

 

Mr. Camp wanted to know if they will turn in the plans to DRC.

 

Ms. Witol explained that she will call them.  She also noted that if they can work fast it would help them.

 

Mr. Rainey wanted to know the deadline for everyone to sign off.

 

Ms. Witol indicated that the department couldn’t determine that, that it involves every department and they would need to come in to sign off.

 

Mr. Camp wanted to know if there was a date that the department had to have the signatures.

 

Ms. Witol noted that she wasn’t sure which date Mr. Camp is looking for.  She indicated that she has to have her staff report done 3 weeks before the meeting and that’s if there are no conditions.

 

18.        Please have the street names approved by Osceola County 911. A form must be received from 911

prior to plat being released for recording.

19.        Please ensure that all lots meet the minimum lot requirements per the pud ordinance. A statement will

be required from the surveyor at the time of final plat.

20.        Several of the lots are oddly shaped. Please include separate enlarged detail for these lots showing

how these lots will meet the setbacks (at a scale smaller than 1:200) including Lots 675, 611, 594, 612,

557, 331,

21.        The final master plan shall include the following exhibits:

2. A soils map and a detailed soils report based on the finding of a recognized professional soils

expert. Depth of all muck and peat areas shall be identified.

22.        When the final version is reviewed, Planning reserves the right to add more comments based on

revisions.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Recommend approval with conditions and that changes be made to plans prior to moving forward to

Planning Board.

 

Mr. Rainey wanted to know if these changes need to come back to staff for review.

 

Ms. Witol indicated that there is a change in the process.  She noted that these are subdivision plans, after DRC they could submit 1 large set that can be taken forward that way we can make sure all of your conditions are met and something doesn’t get caught up at City Council.

 

INFORMATION:

1.         Our final master plan process has changed. Please submit 1 full size copy of the final master plan

meeting all DRC corrections. Once DRC signs off on this plan, you will be contacted to submit 15

reduced copies (11 x 17) of final master plan prior to being scheduled for Planning Board.

2.         The CDD parks, CDD Development Area, and Neighborhood Parks will require separate site plan

approval

3.         Please be advised that no model homes or centers will be permitted prior to recording of the final plat.

Any such structures shall also require approval of a “Mini Site Plan”. `Revised plans must be submitted

within sixty (60) days of this review. Revised plans submitted after the allotted time frame will require a

new application including payment of additional fees.

4.         All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal. Rolled plans will not be accepted.

5.         Effective immediately, all residential and commercial developments approved (issuance of a “Notice to

Proceed” shall constitute approval) after December 15, 2005 shall be assessed a “CyberSpot Capital

Expansion” charge due and payable prior to issuance of a “Notice to Proceed” for the development.

This fee shall be assessed as follows:

Per Residential Unit: $118.46

Per square foot of Commercial property: $0.0068

Please reference Resolution #2005-418R, Ordinance #2005-168, and Section 6.1.10.1 of the

Land Development Code.

 

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

CONDITIONS:

1.         A South Florida Water Management District permit is required for this project.

 

 

FINDING: Approved

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.                   Case #6-36.01 – Comp Plan Amendment (Planner, John Groenendaal)

City of St. Cloud Comprehensive Plan

Text Amendment

 

John Groenendaal with the City of St. Cloud was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1. No comments on these amendments.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1. No comments.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1. No comments.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1. Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1. No comment.

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1. Support this amendment as it will make the current LDC requirements consistent with the Plan.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

CONDITIONS: 

1. The District has no comment regarding this case.

 

FINDING: Approved

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


6.         Case #5-31.04 – Tradition (Planner, John Groenendaal)

                                                South of 17th & Louisiana Avenue

                                                Final Plat

 

Jim Wells of Wiregrass Development and Rick Brown of Brown & Johnston, Inc were present to represent the applicant.

 

Mr. Wells informed the Committee that they comply with everything that the City has asked for.

 

Mr. Groenendaal noted that he needed to get signatures from everyone.

 

Ms. Hobbs indicated that the signoff sheet is done and in the workroom for the committee members to sign off on.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this final plat.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         Please provide the OR Book and Page Number of the 40’ wide drainage easement along the east boundary of the project.  Does the above mentioned easement run north to the public ROW known as 17th St.?       

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.                   Describe a minimum 40’ x 40’ utility easement for the sanitary sewer lift station site.

2.                   Describe a minimum 50’ utility easement over the existing drainage easement where the water and reclaimed water mains connect to Julianne Ct.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         The legal on boundary survey and final plat don’t match.

2.         Lot 45 is to be setback 30 feet, revise

3.         Will not schedule this for Planning Board until the PSP/Construction Plans are approved.

4.         Follow the Plat Checklist once the Final Plat has City Council approval.

INFORMATION:

1.                   Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review.  Revised plans submitted after the allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees. Please be advised that the number of plans required for submittal has increased to 15 sets.

2.                   All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal.  Rolled plans will not be accepted.

3.                   Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         The District recommends approval of this case.

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY (911 ADDRESSING)

INFORMATION:

1.         Street names for this project have been approved.

 

FINDING: Approved

ADJOURNMENT:  The meeting was adjourned at 2:47