Homepage -Family

Go To Search
TwitterFacebook
YouTube
 

View Other Items in this Archive | View All Archives | Printable Version

CITY OF ST. CLOUD

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES

 

DATE OF MEETING:      January 26, 2006

 

LOCATION:                   1300 9th Street - 1st Floor – DRC Conference Room; St. Cloud

 

CALL TO ORDER:         2:00 P.M.

 

CHAIRMAN:                  David Nearing, Planning and Zoning Director

 

SECRETARY:               Michelle Orton, DRC Secretary

 

MEMBERS PRESENT:

Michele Bronson            Jeffrey Higgins               John Groenendaal          Ron Trowell                  

Mark Luthie                   Rick Mauro                    Dave Ennis                    Ken Peck                     

 

Lt. Bret Dunn and  Ms. Veronica Witol were excused.

 

NEW BUSINESS:

 

1.         Case #6-38.01 – David Lecklitner (Planner, Jeff Higgins)

2124 Canoe Creek Road Roads

Annexation/LUA/Zoning 

 

David Lecklitner was present to represent himself as the applicant.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this annexation.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

  1. The solid waste collection service will be provided along Canoe Creek Road. The owner will need to wheel the carts to Canoe Creek Road on collection day.     

 

Mr. Luthie noted that if Mr. Lecklitner could roll his trash can to the road they would be able to provide service along Canoe Creek Road.

 

Mr. Lecklitner indicated that would be fine since they are currently doing that with the County.

 

Mr. Luthie and Mr. Lecklitner discussed the color of the cans and their uses.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         The Lines Division does not object to this request for annexation.

INFORMATION:

2.         This address is currently connected to City water. Sanitary sewer service is not currently available to this site. If sanitary sewer was requested in the future, service could only be provided from California Avenue in which an easement would be required from the adjacent homeowners to install a line between parcels.

 

Mr. Lecklitner indicated that they are currently receiving city water and that they currently having their own septic and will not be requesting service from the City.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         Upon annexation, this site will receive fire protection from the St. Cloud Fire Rescue Department.  In order for the site to receive the ISO rating inherent with the rest of the City, a hydrant must be located within 1000 feet of any existing structures, measured along the road right-of-way and shall not be measured across private property not designated and used as a road right-of-way.  Furthermore, any future development will require standards set forth according to the City of St. Cloud’s Land Development Code.

INFORMATION:

1.         Due to the location, access to this property could cause a delay in Fire Rescue operations.

 

Mr. Lecklitner indicated that he does have a fire plug.

 

Mr. Ennis noted that this is a standard comment.

 

Mr. Lecklitner commented that they had just purchased the home and by becoming part of the city it will lower his fire insurance.  He is currently paying over $2,500 for fire insurance.  He is only ½ a mile from the City’s fire department and a lot further to the county fire station which is on Deer Run. 

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No Comment

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

RECOMMENDATIONS:

            Approval of Annexation, MDR Residential LUA, and R-2 Zoning.

INFORMATION:

2.         A petition for annexation must be included with this application, as well as, a statement of intended use.

 

Mr. Higgins indicated that he did not have Mr. Lecklitner’s signature for annexation or an intended use form.

 

Mr. Lecklitner noted that it was residential.

 

Mr. Higgins indicated that he will be recommending R-2 zoning.

 

Mr. Lecklitner wanted to know about the mailings.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that certified mailings would be sent out to those living within 300 feet of his property, the staff would then write up a staff report to take to the Planning Board and the City Council, for a first reading and then it will go back for Public Hearing when the ordinance will be adopted to make Mr. Lecklitner a residence of the City of St. Cloud.  Mr. Nearing then indicated to Mr. Lecklitner that he was welcome to attend all of these meetings.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

CONDITIONS:

1.         The District has no comment regarding this case.

 

FINDING: Approved

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.         Case #4-93.02 – Deer Creek West (Planner, John Groenendaal)

S of Mallard Pond/W of Deer Creek

Abandonment of Right-of-Way

 

Jeremy Kibler with Real Deal Development Group Inc., was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this abandonment.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.    

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         It is OK with the Orlando Utilities Commission Electric Engineering Division to Abandon the Right-of-Way.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         Vacating of the SLIC is appropriate.

2.         Letters to utilities were sent January 18, 2006

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Recommend to approve

INFORMATION:

1.         Access to the Beach Property is to be maintained. Please show how that would occur if he asked tomorrow

 

Mr. Groenendaal questioned Mr. Kibler if he had a drawing for the beach property.

 

Mr. Kibler noted that he did.

 

Mr. Groenendaal and Mr. Kibler reviewed the plans.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

CONDITIONS:

1.         The District has no comment regarding this case.

 

Mr. Peck wanted to know if the property was already annexed before the CyberSpot.

 

Mr. Groenendaal indicated that they will pay before the Notice to Proceed.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated to Mr. Kibler that he did know about the fee.

 

Mr. Kibler noted that he did know it had been implemented.

 

Mr. Nearing then introduced Mr. Peck as the newest member of the DRC and that he would be working with the CyberSpot.

 

Mr. Peck listed the fees:

Per Residential Unit: $118.46

Per square foot of Commercial property: $0.0068

Resolution #2005-418R, Ordinance #2005-168, and Section 6.1.10.1 of the

Land Development Code.

 

Mr. Peck indicated that he would also need to be receiving the plans so that he could make sure that the sites are shown.

 

Mr. Kibler wanted to know when they would have to pay.

 

Mr. Nering indicated that it was before their Notice to Proceed.

 

Mr. Kibler noted that he will get a set to Mr. Peck

 

Mr. Nearing advised Mr. Kibler that if he did this with his construction plans they would already be on the plans when he was ready to go.

 

FINDING:  Approved

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.                  .         DING:

now follow John....CREEKCase #4-59.10 – Anthem Park, Phase 4 (Planner, John Groenendaal)

Kissimmee Park Road

                                                            Subdivision Variance

 

Brian Malmberg with Miller, Einhouse, Rymer and Boyd and Mike Terechenok with D.R. Horton were present to represent the application.

 

Mr. Malmberg noted that the variance was submitted to the plans so they are resubmitting the geometry plan.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this variance.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         This variance request will not have an adverse effect on the Public Works Department.  We therefore recommend approval of the variance.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         The Lines Division will not support this variance request without receiving a new layout of utility locations and utility easements, for review.

 

Mr. Malmberg noted that they had not changed anything from the PUD site plan.  He questioned which new layout they would need to submit.  He noted that it is laid out within the 42 foot width along with water mains.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

2.         The Fire Rescue Department has the same concerns as lines division.

 

Mr. Malmberg noted that the Fire Department’s concern was the same as lines.

 

Mr. Ennis indicated that if Mr. Mauro was alright then he was fine also.

 

Mr. Malmberg noted that they are within the 42 foot width.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No Comment

2.         Please contact OUC Engineer Jeff Mann to make him aware of adjustments, you can reach him at 407-384-4013 e-mail  jmann@ouc.com

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.                     Need to provide the responses to the 3 questions of Section 5.4.1.a.

 

 

Mr. Malberg indicated that they submitted a narrative.

 

Mr. Nearing questioned if they could get that electronically that would be great.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Deferring until PW comments.

INFORMATION:

1.         Was the 22 foot roadway approved or should this be part of the variance also. 

 

Mr. Groenendaal indicated that Mr. Malmberg could ignore the two comments.

 

Mr. Mauro wanted to know if the plans showed the phone and cable.

 

Mr. Malmberg noted that it did not because they was still a concern.

 

Mr. Mauro then questioned if they were still separated.

 

Mr. Malmberg indicated that they were.

 

Mr. Groenendaal noted that the Planning Department would need to get signed off for the plans and that we would need an additional 15 sets for sign off. 

 

Mr. Malberg noted that he would get those to the Department.

 

Mr. Nearing then introduced Mr. Ken Peck from the IT Department.

 

Mr. Peck discussed the new fee with Mr. Malmberg for CyberSpot.

 

Mr. Malmberg wanted to know when this fee was due.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that it was due prior to the Notice to Proceed.

 

Mr. Peck noted that he would like to see anything coming in now so that they can give it to their people that will be doing the installation.  He asked that the plans show street lights since this is where it will be installed.

 

Mr. Terechenok wanted to know if this was another plan that needs to be approved.

 

Mr. Peck indicated that this was just so they could coordinate, that it would not need to go to a committee.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

CONDITIONS:

1.         The District has no comment regarding this case.

 

FINDING: Approved

 

ADJOURNMENT:  2:25