Homepage -Family

Go To Search
TwitterFacebook
YouTube
 

View Other Items in this Archive | View All Archives | Printable Version

CITY OF ST. CLOUD

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES

 

DATE OF MEETING:      September 22, 2005

 

LOCATION:                   1300 9th Street - 1st Floor – DRC Conference Room; St. Cloud

 

CALL TO ORDER:         2:00 P.M.

 

CHAIRMAN:                  Dave Nearing, Dir. Of Planning & Zoning

 

SECRETARY:               Marty Hobbs, Development Officer

 

MEMBERS PRESENT:

Dave Nearing                 Mark Luthie                   Bret Dunn                      Jeffrey Higgins

Dave Ennis                    John Groenendaal          Ron Trowell                   Angelo Perri

Rick Mauro

 

NEW BUSINESS:

 

1.         Case #5-1.11 – Friday Night Live (October)

                                                Downtown St. Cloud

                                                Special Event (Major)

 

Ms. Amy Hartman was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         Temporary electrical wiring shall comply with the National Electrical Code (NEC) 2002 Articles 525 and 527. Note: Temporary wiring shall be ground-fault protected. Multi-conductor cord shall originate in an approved power outlet or panelboard and be of the type identified in Table 400-4 for hard usage or extra hard usage. Receptacles shall be the grounding type. Lamps shall be protected from accidental contact or breakage. Electrical cords shall be protected from damage and shall be placed so as to prevent trip hazards.  When receptacles are installed on flexible cords/cables and exposed to weather or in wet             locations, they shall be in a weatherproof enclosure.

2.         If tents over 300 sq. ft. are used they shall comply with the Florida Building Code (FBC) 2001Section 3103.1 and Section 1019.5. Certification of flame resistance shall be filed with the building department prior to a permit being issued.

3.         Tent exits, aisles, seating, etc. shall conform to assembly occupancy. All exits shall be kept free of              obstructions while tent is occupied by the public.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.    

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         All fire protection equipment; building exits and other safety features shall remain accessible.

2.         A lane shall remain open to allow emergency vehicles access if needed. (Movable barricades are acceptable

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

Page 2, DRC Minutes – 09/22/05

 

 

1.         The applicant will be required to pay for one police officer additional to the one the city currently provides on all future events. The rate of pay is $24.00/hour.  

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         All food vendors must be properly licensed and inspected.

2          All business owners and/or residents affected by the street closure(s) must be notified, in writing, a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the event date.

3.         In the event that unforeseen problems arise, the DRC may at any time request reconsideration of this approval.

INFORMATION:

4.         As a DRC approved special Event, the applicant is authorized to utilize off-site signage to advertise and/or direct traffic for the event.  Please be advised that all signage must be placed so as to prevent visual obstruction to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic, must be free standing and may be utilized beginning one week prior to the event.  All signage must be removed the day following the final day of the event.

5.         The applicant or any Committee member may request a post review of the event(s).  Please contact Marty Hobbs at (407) 957-7253 or via email to mhobbs@stcloud.org to schedule the review.

 

PARKS & RECREATION

CONDITIONS:

1.                   We will set up the stage the same as the Month of July.

 

RISK MANAGEMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         All paperwork is in order for all events through 6/21/06 (Certificate expires)

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.

 

FINDING:

The DRC recommended approval with the conditions stated.

 

 

 

 

 

2.         Case #5-30.03 – Advanced Marine Services

                                                1322 Carolina Avenue

                                                Site Plan Variance

 

Mr. Skip Holtkamp and Mr. Jason Wagner were present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on the site plan.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         We have no comment pertaining to the landscape buffer variance request. 

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

Page 3, DRC Minutes – 09/22/05

 

 

1.         Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.                   Submit the landscape plan in the plans.  Planning will hold the decision on the variance until the landscaping is shown.

 

Mr. Holtkamp noted that he would prefer to wait until after action is taken on the variance to prevent having to re-do the plans after the fact.

 

Mr. Wagner explained the need to move the access so it would always be available for movement of the boats.  He noted that the gates would be closer to Carolina Avenue.

 

Mr. Holtkamp noted that the gate post would be at the corner of Carolina with the gate opening behind the parking spaces.  He also noted that there could be increases elsewhere if needed.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that the Council was going to want to see how the space was going to be made up and recommended that a conceptual plan be submitted to show the change.

 

2.                   Submit 12 reduced copies of the plan with landscaping for City Council.

RECOMMENDATION:

3.         Recommend approval based on the applicant satisfying Planning.

INFORMATION:

4.                   The Advanced Marine Site Plan must be revised within 30 days of the City Council decision regarding the variance.  Otherwise a resubmittal fee will be required. 

5.                   After Planning has reviewed the landscaping, and after we have received reduced copies of the plan, this item shall be placed on the next available City Council agenda.

6.                   All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal.  Rolled plans will not be accepted.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         This project will require review by the City Engineering Department only.

 

FINDING:

The DRC recommended approval with the conditions as stated.

 

 

 

 

 

3.         Case #4-59.07 – Anthem Park, Phase 3

                                                Kissimmee Park Road

                                                Subdivision Construction Plans

 

Mr. Jim Wells was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on the site plans.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         The proposed access to Kissimmee Park Road will need to be approved by Osceola County.          

 

Page 4, DRC Minutes – 09/22/05

 

 

2.         Any proposed setbacks along Kissimmee Park Road for the purpose of R/W reservation will need to be discussed and approved by Osceola County for the future widening of the roadway.          

3.         Lots 488 – 523 appear to be type “B” grading.  If that is the intent please label accordingly.

 

Mr. Wells noted that these were to be townhouse lots so there would be no A, B or C grading.

 

Mr. Luthie asked if a drainage plan was going to be submitted for the townhouses.

 

Mr. Wells noted that it would be submitted with the building plans.

 

Mr. Luthie noted that he would look at them when the plans come in.

 

4.         What is the intended use of Tract V?

5.         What is the intended use of the area between Tracts U, R, S, and T?

6.         The City of St. Cloud will not maintain the alleys.

7.         The landscaped boulevards will need to be maintained by the HOA and be described as a tract dedicated to the HOA.

8.         Please revise sheet 11.09.  In the profile the 18” storm pipe is identified as “PVC”.

9.         Please revise all typical road sections on sheet 12.0 to provide a 1 foot separation between the edge of the sidewalk and the R/W line.

10.        Under drains will be required unless a soils report is submitted which indicates the season high water table is sufficiently below the subgrade.

11.         All handicap ramps will need truncated domes as warning devices next to all roadways in compliance with the latest standards.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.                   Provide pipe sizing map showing all pipe sizes per the original plan based on the hydraulic report for Phase 3.

2.                   Correct current submitted plans using the original design plan and resubmit for DRC review.

3.                   Provide a reclaim water hydraulic analysis report.

4.                   Additional comments and/or conditions maybe applicable upon further review after revised submittal has been received.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         Distance from or spacing for hydrants located within single family residential subdivisions shall not exceed five hundred (500) feet and shall be connected to water mains no less than eight (8) inches in diameter. The required distance between all hydrants shall be measured along the road right-of-way and shall not be measured across private property not designated and used as a road right-of-way. No individual hydrant shall be designed to deliver more than 1000 GPM of required fire flow. (L.D.C. 7.9.2.b.1)

2.         Fire hydrants in commercial, industrial, and high-density residential areas shall be spaced no greater than three hundred fifty (350) feet apart and shall be connected to mains no less than eight (8) inches in diameter.  In addition, hydrants shall be located so that the radius of one hundred seventy five (175) feet from the hydrant shall strike a portion of the structure, as well as strike the same radius of the next hydrant on the property. The required distance between all hydrants shall be measured along the road right-of-way and shall not be measured across private property not designated and used as a road right-of-way. No individual hydrant shall be designed to deliver more than 1000 GPM of required fire flow.  (L.D.C. 7.9.2.b.1)

3.         Fire Hydrants and Fire Protection Appliances shall have clearances of 7.5 feet front and sides and 4 foot to the rear for hydrants. (NFPA1 18.3.4.1)

4.         Submit a master plan on one sheet to scale for hydrant placement.

 

Mr. Wells asked if townhomes were considered high density.

 

Fire Marshall advised Mr. Wells to provide him with a site plan and he would indicate where the hydrants would need to be placed.

Page 5, DRC Minutes – 09/22/05

 

 

Mr. Wells noted that he would get a copy of the plan to the Fire Marshall.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1.         The owner shall install all electric conduit, primary manholes or pullboxes, concrete switchgear pads, concrete transformer pads, and secondary pullboxes required to install electric within the project.  Please have all the conduit and pads installed and passed inspection by OUC three weeks before you need electric power.

2.         A 10’ wide utility easement will be required on all property lines abutting right-of-way.  Other easements may be required.

INFORMATION:

3.         OUC can provide street lights for this project.  Please contact Development Services.

4.         Please send all site and electric information to OUC Development Services:

            44 W. Jefferson Street                (407) 236-9652 – Fax (407) 236-9628

P.O. Box 3193                           email: developmentservices@ouc.com

Orlando, FL  32802

5.         Once all information is obtained by Development Services and Engineer will be assigned to the project.

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         Substantially, matches the Master Plan

INFORMATION:

2.                   Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review.  Revised plans submitted after the allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees. Please be advised that the number of plans required for submittal has increased to 15 sets.

3.                   All submitted plans must be folded at the time of submittal.  Rolled plans will not be accepted.

4.                   Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right of way permits and concurrency prior to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

CONDITIONS:

1.         A South Florida Water Management District permit is required for this project.

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY (911 ADDRESSING)

CONDITIONS:

1.         Applicant shall clear all proposed street names with the 911 Addressing Department.  Please submit preliminary plans for review.

 

FINDING:

The DRC recommended approval with conditions.  The applicant will submit revised construction plans within sixty (60) days of this review.

 

 

 

 

4.         Case #5-65.04 – St. Cloud East Commercial Center

                                                Irlo Bronson Hwy between Crawford Ave & Old Hickory Tree Rd

                                                Site Plan Variance

 

Mr. Skip Holtkamp was present to represent the application.

 

Mr. Holtkamp noted that the applicant intended to request a variance to the required buffering between the parcels.  He explained that the owners had cooperated and put into place agreements to address the issue.  He further noted that the variance was needed because of joint access, retention and other issues.

 

Mr. Nearing advised Mr. Holtkamp that it would need to be made clear in some sort of recordable document that nothing could be done to one property without the approval of the other.

 

Page 6, DRC Minutes – 09/22/05

 

 

Mr. Holtkamp explained that it was clearly indicated in the documents that the City Attorney had approved.  He also noted that once the project was completed you would not be able to tell that it was actually two separate parcels.

 

Mr. Groenendaal discussed the right-of-way dedication on Crawford and the tree plantings along U.S. 192.

 

Mr. Holtkamp described the 20% open space and 20% landscaping that would be provided.

 

Mr. Groenendaal explained that he would still need to have something to present to Council but noted that he would work that out with the applicant later and the issue was discussed.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.    

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         Provide a response to the three conditions which are

1.   That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structures, or required subdivision improvements involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or required subdivision improvements;

2.   That a literal interpretation of the provisions of these regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties with similar conditions;

3.   That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

2.         Given the design and cross access and master drainage it seems appropriate to consider the variance as a sensible request. 

3.         The area of the 10 foot buffer (two five foot buffer) has been absorbed into the buffers along Crawford Avenue and the Private drive which appears equitable.

4.         Would recommend increasing the number of plantings or maturity of new plantings on the perimeter to compensate for reduction, this can be made part the justification.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         This project will require review by the City Engineering Department only.

 

FINDING:

The DRC recommended approval with conditions.  The case will be forwarded to City Council for final action.

 

 

 

 

5.         Case #4-17.08 – Michigan Estates

                                                NE Corner of Michigan & Fertic

                                                Final Plat

 

Page 7, DRC Minutes – 09/22/05

 

 

Ms. Patty McCurdy and Mr. John Kidd were present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on the final plat.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         Please revise the 10’ D.U.E. which abuts the street R/W to a 10’ U.E. The easement is not for drainage purposes.

2.         The proposed easement between lots 32 and 33 is intended for drainage purposes only.  Please remove the reference to utility.  If it is the intent to construct a sewer main to the lift station tract LS then provide a continuation of the utility easement across tract P-2.        

 

Ms. McCurdy explained that the easement is shown as utility and drainage but that a sewer line would also be running through it.

 

Mr. Luthie explained the need for a lift station easement and the issue was briefly discussed.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         Please add a utility easement over the utilities within Tract P-2, from the rear of lot lines up to the lift station site.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH

CONDITIONS:

1.                   Applicant must apply for permits to abandon all existing wells and septic tanks on the property prior to land clearing and/or building.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1.         The final plat meets the requirements of The Orlando Utilities Commission Electric Engineering Division.

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         Legal on the plat and survey are to match.

2.         Provide the memo from 911/Addressing that approved the street names.

3.         The subdivision variance had as a condition, a requirement for a 6 foot landscape easement this should be on the plat.

 

Ms. McCurdy noted that she was not aware of any such variance but that the plat showed a five foot easement along Fertic Road.

 

Mr. Groenendaal explained that it was needed to buffer the bus barn from the lots.

 

Ms. McCurdy asked if the six foot landscape buffer was required.

 

Mr. Groenendaal explained that the natural buffer material may have been mowed down.  He noted that if that is the case, the applicant will need to install landscape buffering from the pond to the edge of the bus barn but if the natural buffer is in tact, no additional plantings will be needed.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that he, Mr. Groenendaal and Mr. Kidd would need to visit the site to make a determination regarding the best location for the buffer.  He explained that either way, the buffer easement would need to be shown on the plat.

Page 8, DRC Minutes – 09/22/05

 

 

4.         The plat is to include the other PB & PG of the surrounding plats.

5.         The Mayor’s approval block should read “This is to certify, that on _____________ the City Council of the City of St. Cloud approved the forgoing plat.” or similar language.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         The District recommends approval.

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY (911 ADDRESSING)

CONDITIONS:

1.         Applicant shall clear all proposed street names with the 911 Addressing Department.  Please submit preliminary and final plat for review.

 

Mr. Groenendaal noted that this case would be going to Planning Board on October 18th and to City Council in November.

 

FINDING:

The DRC recommended approval with the conditions stated.  The case will be moved forward to the Planning Board and City Council for final action.

 

 

 

 

 

6.         Case #5-03.09 – LDC Amendments (Miscellaneous)

                                                City Wide LDC Changes

                                                LDC Amendments

 

Mr. John Groenendaal was present to represent the case.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on LDC amendments.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comment.    

 

LINES DIVISION

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         Draft language is presented for review,

2.         Changes to the Erosion Control and Cyberspot language are needed for the regular DRC meeting.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         The District has no comment.

Page 9, DRC Minutes – 09/08/05

 

 

FINDING:

The proposed amendments will be moved forward to Planning Board for review and City Council for public hearings and adoption.

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.         Case #5-85.01 – Turtle Creek, Phase 1A & 1B

S of Rummell Road; W of Narcoossee Road

W/S Request & Annexation (Continued from 9/8/05)

 

Mr. Val Taylor was present to represent the application.  He noted that he had resolved most of the outstanding issues since the last meeting.

 

Mr. Luthie again noted that there would be no parking allowed in the alleyways.

 

Mr. Taylor noted that verbiage had been added to the deed restriction to address that condition.  He also noted that he had met and reached an agreement with Mr. Swingle regarding the lift station but that he was not able to commit to the booster plant because his client does not own the property.  He then asked if the full 2 acres would be needed for the plant.

 

Mr. Mauro noted that Mr. Taylor would need to discuss the matter with Mr. Swingle.

 

Mr. Luthie noted that some of the travel lanes did not meet City requirements because they were only ten feet.  He explained that the ten feet was a County requirement but he was OK with it.

 

Mr. Nearing recommended that the applicant look at the possibility of developing the property as a PUD.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this request.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         All transportation access points along Narcoossee Road and Rummell Road will need to be reviewed and permitted by Osceola County.  Any proposed traffic signal will require a warrant from Osceola County.  All R/W reservations will be based on the future transportation corridor needs as deemed necessary by Osceola County.

2.         The City of St. Cloud will not maintain the proposed alleys.

3.         The proposed 10’ travel lanes do not meet the minimum lane width of 11’ per the City of St. Cloud LDC.  We recommend a variance to the LDC be processed upon annexation of the project.  Staff will support the variance request.

4.         Be advised that solid waste collection trucks must use the paved alleys for collection service.  No vehicles shall be parked upon the paved surface due to the need to provide collection service.  Please provide language in the deeds, covenants, and restrictions which will prohibit parking in the alleys.

6.         Will the club house area need a solid waste dumpster with enclosure?

7.         We recommend a bike path be constructed along Narcoossee Road and along Rummell Rd.

 

CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.                   Per Resolution 98-27R, one third of estimated sewer impact fees, $421,168.27, is required prior to approval of the Certificate of Capacity by City Council.  The remaining estimated balance, $855,099.30, is due within 90 days of issuance of a Certificate of Capacity.

2.                   Please submit legal description in Microsoft Word format.

3.                   If the applicant wishes to wait until after the annexation is complete to send the Certificate of Capacity to the City Council for approval, the sewer reservation fee will be calculated at the City rate.

Page 10, DRC Minutes – 09/08/05

 

 

INFORMATION:

4.                   The Certificate of Capacity shall be placed on the next available City Council Consent Agenda after the sewer reservation fee has been paid and the legal description in Microsoft Word Format has been received.  In order to be on the 10/13/05 agenda please submit prior to 9/26/05.

5.                   The sewer reservation fees and balance are calculated at the County rate due to the subject property not currently being located within the City Limits.  If the property is annexed, then the additional amount shall be credited towards other impact fees.

6.                   The Sewer Capacity Reservation Fee equal to 33% of the estimated sanitary sewer impact fee.  For the residential development this is 433 dwelling units x $2,947.50 = $1,276,267.50 x 33% = $421,168.27

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.                   Provide a Hydraulic Analysis report on the water, sanitary sewer and reclaimed water systems. Provide all future connections in the reports.

2.                   Provide validation that the gravity sewer system will handle the flows from the future phase 2.  

3.                   The planners previously agreed with the City of St. Cloud to provide a 2 acre site for a water booster station along Rummell Road. Please identify location on the plans.

4.                   The lift station number is # 85 with the manhole structures beginning with 85-01.

5.                   Relocate the gate valve to the tapping sleeve at the wet tap locations.

6.                   Provide an 8” reduced pressure backflow preventer at all points of connection from the water main to the reclaimed water main.

7.                   Provide a minimum of 3 each gate valves at each Tee and 4 each gate valves at each cross on the water and reclaimed water mains.

8.                   Provide all jumper and water sample point locations.

9.                   Provide a gate valve with a temporary blow-off at all phase lines on the water and reclaimed water mains and a minimum of 13LF stub-out from a sanitary sewer manholes.

10.               Change the size of the water service to a 1” sized line.

11.               An in-line gate valve is required on the sanitary sewer force main every 1,000 LF.

12.               Provide a 6” sanitary sewer lateral to the recreation area (Tract R1).

13.               Some of the sanitary sewer lateral connections are shown against the flow of the system. Please correct the directions.

14.               Provide an air release valve at STA 10+25 on the sanitary sewer force main.

15.               Include the reclaimed water main on the profiles including all deflections around conflicts.

16.               Change the slope of the sanitary sewer main between manhole no. 58 & 59 and also 53 & 54to a .40% grade and show manhole no. 59 & 54 as an outside drop structures.

17.               Show all deflections on the profiles.        

18.               Show all of the force main locations on the profile.

19.               Adjust the conflict between the force main and the storm at STA 242+07.

20.               Re-route the existing force main along Rummell Road into the gravity system manhole no. 18 on Street “D” and upsize the gravity sewer main from #18 to the lift station.

21.               A minimum10 foot diameter wet well with a tri-plex setup control panel and access hatch will be required.

22.               Upgrade the proposed force main to a minimum 12” diameter size and extend the main along south along Narcoossee Road and east along Lillian Lee Road and south along Nora Tyson Road to the intersection of Lake Lizzie Drive. Provide a wye connection and valves at the Lillian Lee Road intersection with the existing 8” main.

23.               A Developers Agreement will be required to define the level of Impact Fee credits for the Cities share of costs.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

24.               A minimum sized service of 2” is recommended for the reclaimed water services to the tracts.

25.               Correct plans and resubmit for DRC review.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         Distance from or spacing for hydrants located within single family residential subdivisions shall not exceed five hundred (500) feet and shall be connected to water mains no less than eight (8) inches in diameter. The required distance between all hydrants shall be measured along the road right-of-way and shall not be measured across private property not designated and used as a road right-of-way. No

Page 11, DRC Minutes – 09/08/05

           

 

individual hydrant shall be designed to deliver more than 1000 GPM of required fire flow. (L.D.C. 7.9.2.b.1)

2.         Fire hydrants in commercial, industrial, and high-density residential areas shall be spaced no greater than three hundred fifty (350) feet apart and shall be connected to mains no less than eight (8) inches in diameter.  In addition, hydrants shall be located so that the radius of one hundred seventy five (175) feet from the hydrant shall strike a portion of the structure, as well as strike the same radius of the next hydrant on the property. The required distance between all hydrants shall be measured along the road right-of-way and shall not be measured across private property not designated and used as a road right-of-way. No individual hydrant shall be designed to deliver more than 1000 GPM of required fire flow.  (L.D.C. 7.9.2.b.1)

3.         Fire Hydrants and Fire Protection Appliances shall have clearances of 7.5 feet front and sides and 4 foot to the rear for hydrants. (NFPA1 18.3.4.1)

4.         Submit a master plan for hydrant lay out.

5.         Before and during construction, when combustibles are brought onto the site in such quantities as deemed hazardous by the fire official, paved roads to provide access for fire vehicles and a suitable water supply for fire protection acceptable to the fire department shall be provided and maintained.  (L.D.C. 6.1.21.3)

6.         Proof of adequate fire flow must be submitted to the public works department for verification prior to site plan approval by the fire rescue department. Fire flow for the Town House section will be 2000gpm.

INFORMATION:

7.         All comments based upon annexation of property.

 

OUC (ELECTRIC UTILITY)

CONDITIONS:

1.         The owner shall install all electric conduit, primary manholes or pullboxes, concrete switchgear pads, concrete transformer pads and secondary pullboxes required to install electric within the project.  Please have all conduit and pads installed and passed inspection by OUC three weeks before power is needed.

2.         A 10’ foot wide utility easement will be required on all property lines abutting a right-of-way.  Other easements may also be required.

INFORMATION:

3.         OUC can provide street lights for this project.  Please contact Development Services.

4.         Please send all site and electric information to OUC Development Services:

44 W. Jefferson Street                (407) 236-9652 – Fax (407) 236-9628

            PO Box 3193                             email: developmentservices@ouc.com

            Orlando, FL  32802

5.         Once all information is obtained by Development Services and Engineer will be assigned to the project.

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.                   Applicant to secure a certificate of capacity pursuant to Article XIV “Concurrency Management” of the Land Development Code of the City of St. Cloud, FL, and pay all applicable impact, tap, and other fees required of connection.  Certificate of Capacity to be issued prior to connection;

2.                   Certificate of capacity to be valid for a period of one (1) year,

3.                   Concurrency will only be approved for the requested phase.

4.                   This application will also begin the process of annexation of the subject property pursuant to a petition for annexation submitted as a part of this application.  Based on the density of 2.54 a Low Density Residential land use and PUD zoning will be requested as part of the annexation, unless the applicant notifies the City in writing of a different request.

5.                   Please submit a copy of the approved PD zoning in the County and any and all applicable paperwork.

6.                   Please submit a copy of the stamped approved plans and a copy of the approval letter from Osceola County listing any and all conditions. 

7.                   Please submit legal description in Microsoft Word format.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

8.         Planning recommends approval of the request with the above conditions:

Page 12, DRC Minutes – 09/08/05

 

 

INFORMATION:

9.         City staff shall have an additional meeting regarding the annexation of this property, and will then place the annexation on the next available Planning Board agenda.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

CONDITIONS:

1.         This project will require review by the City Engineering Department only.

 

FINDING:

The DRC recommended approval with the conditions as recommended by staff.

 

 

 

ADJOURNMENT:  The meeting was adjourned at 2:35 P.M.