View Other Items in this Archive | View All Archives | Printable Version

CITY OF ST. CLOUD

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES

REGULAR

 

 

DATE OF MEETING:      November 30, 2006                   

 

LOCATION:                   1300 9th Street - 1st Floor – DRC Conference Room; St. Cloud

 

CALL TO ORDER:         2:00 P.M.

 

CHAIRMAN:                  David Nearing, Director of Planning and Zoning

 

SECRETARY:               Michelle Orton, Development Coordinator

 

MEMBERS PRESENT:

Jeff Higgins                    John Groenendaal          Ted Kozak         Dave Ennis                   

Ken Peck                      Bob Friend                    Mark Luthie       Rick Mauro

Ron Trowell                  

 

1.                   Case #06-115.02 – Old Hickory (John Groenendaal, Senior Planner)

East of Old Hickory Subdivision

Annexation/SSLUA/Zoning; 5 Acres

 

No one was present to represent the application.

 

Mr. Groenendaal noted that they were happy and didn’t have any problems with the comments.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this annexation.

 

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         With the implementation of the Cyber Spot wireless system thru out the City of St. Cloud, “Cyber Spot

Capital Expansion” charges will apply prior to development of said property.

This fee shall be assessed as follows:

Per Residential Unit: $118.46

Per square foot of Commercial property: $0.0068

Please reference Resolution #2005-418R, Ordinance #2005-168, and Section 6.1.10.1 of the

Land Development Code.

2.         Please note that all cases do not necessarily require poles, but in the cases that do require poles, the

following guidelines will apply.

1. Poles that provide a minimum mounting height of 25 feet, as recommended by the

Radio manufacture and a continuous, non-switched power source, will be required, at the

developer’s expense, for mounting of the radios.

2. In instances of decorative light poles, matching decorative poles, providing a minimum

mounting height of 25 feet, as recommended by the Radio manufacture and a continuous, nonswitched

power source, will be required, at the developer’s expense, for mounting of the radios.

3. Please note that this is a combined effort with OUC and the City of St. Cloud for the

acquisition and placement of the poles that needs to be addressed by the developer during the street

lighting design phase.

4. A layout of the electric system showing transformer locations and street lighting needs too

be supplied to the IT department as soon as possible for determining the number of poles required and

location of the poles.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         Upon annexation, this site will receive fire protection from the St. Cloud Fire Rescue Department. In

order for the site to receive the ISO rating inherent with the rest of the City, a hydrant must be located

within 1000 feet of any existing structures, measured along the road right-of-way and shall not be

measured across private property not designated and used as a road right-of-way. Furthermore, any

future development will require standards set forth according to the City of St. Cloud’s Land

Development Code.

INFORMATION:

1.         Upon annexation the Fire Rescue Department recommends moving forward in the near future with the

staffing of a Fire Station in the eastern area of the City of St. Cloud.

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         Recommend approval of the annexation

2.         Recommend approval of the Low Density Residential

3.         Recommend approval of the Old Hickory PUD for zoning.

INFORMATION:

1.         Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right-of-way permits and concurrency

prior to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comment.

 

FINDING:

            DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

2.                   Case #07-29.01 – Old Hickory Tree Corner (John Groenendaal, Senior Planner)

SW corner of Old Hickory Tree Road and US 192

Preliminary Subdivision Plan; 5 lots; 10.5 acres

 

Karl Theobald was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this preliminary plan.

 

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         With the implementation of the Cyber Spot wireless system thru out the City of St. Cloud, “Cyber Spot

Capital Expansion” charges will apply prior to development of said property.

This fee shall be assessed as follows:

Per Residential Unit: $118.46

Per square foot of Commercial property: $0.0068

Please reference Resolution #2005-418R, Ordinance #2005-168, and Section 6.1.10.1 of the

Land Development Code.

2.         Please note that all cases do not necessarily require poles, but in the cases that do require poles, the

following guidelines will apply.

1. Poles that provide a minimum mounting height of 25 feet, as recommended by the Radio

manufacture and a continuous, non-switched power source, will be required, at the developer’s

expense, for mounting of the radios.

2. In instances of decorative light poles, matching decorative poles, providing a minimum

mounting height of 25 feet, as recommended by the Radio manufacture and a continuous, nonswitched power source, will be required, at the developer’s expense, for mounting of the radios.

3. Please note that this is a combined effort with OUC and the City of St. Cloud for the acquisition

and placement of the poles that needs to be addressed by the developer during the street lighting

design phase.

4. A layout of the electric system showing transformer locations and street lighting needs too be

supplied to the IT department as soon as possible for determining the number of poles required and

location of the poles.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         Previously we discussed the need to align the driveways for this project with the project to the west.

This issue will require a revision to lot 1 and lot 4 in order to align with the driveway on lot 3. The owner

of lot 3 is willing to adjust their driveway to help with the misalignment; however some adjustments will

still be necessary.

 

Mr. Theobald noted that he has already talked about this.

 

Mr. Luthie indicated that they have shifted down without changing the blueprints.  He also noted that they will need to shift one lane about 12-15 feet for about the last 100 feet so that they can stack 3-4 cars and then off set.

 

Mr. Theobald wanted to know which way.

 

Mr. Luthie noted that it would need to be north about 10-15 feet from lot 1.  He indicted that he spoke to the owner and they said they could move the line.

 

Mr. Theobald indicated that they don’t own the property so they can’t do anything with it, they were to only subdivide the property in the sizes that were given to them.

 

Mr. Luthie suggested they get with Mr. Holtkamp for adjustments.

 

CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         The City does require a Certificate of capacity for the extension of water and sewer lines. If water and

sewer are extended throughout the development, I will need a COC application.

INFORMATION:

1.         Please be advised that the Certificate of Capacity will not be moved forward to City Council for approval

until such time as the applicant notifies the Planner that it is needed. Your planner will place the item on

the next available City Council agenda.

 

Mr. Groenendaal noted that if they were putting in lines they will need a concurrency test.

 

Mr. Theobald indicated that they couldn’t put in lines because they don’t have a good handle on the sizes of the lots.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that they need a list or range of the different uses that will be going on in there so they can get an idea of fixture counts.

 

Mr. Theobald indicated that a restaurant, retail, fast food and maybe a bank.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that could be a change in impact fees.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         The lines Division will not comment on the plans submitted. The proposed easements do not match up

future utility connection points. Proposed construction plans required.

Section 5.3.2 Required submittals for preliminary development plan. The preliminary development plan

shall consist of a plat, preliminary engineering plans, and other auxiliary submittals as herein stated.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

2.         Recommend denial

 

 

Mr. Theobald noted that Lines recommend denial, he indicated that they have an idea of what will be going on in there, he wanted to know if they had a PSP if that would help.

 

Mr. Mauro indicated that nothing showed up on the plans that would help him.

 

Mr. Theobald noted that he will have Mr. Taylor do a PSP.

 

Mr. Mauro noted that they will need to show how services will be provided.

 

Mr. Theobald indicated that they will be going down Hickory Tree Road.

 

Mr. Mauro noted that they have already provided a sewer stub.

 

Discussed maps and discussed stubs.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         The Fire Rescue Department can not comment with the information provided.

 

Mr. Ennis indicated that his comments are the same as Mr. Mauro’s in Lines, he needs construction plans.

 

Discussion of plans and showing what needs to be included

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         The PSP shall be on its own drawing not the final plat drawing, and sealed by the Civil Engineer.

2.         Are there any trees on site? Is there flood prone areas?

3.         Refer to where the drainage easement may be found in public record.

4.         Are there draft covenants?

5.         The final plat shall be prepared within 6 months or as defined in 5.2.2.6.

INFORMATION:

1.         Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review. Revised plans submitted after the

allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees. Please be

advised that the number of plans required for submittal has increased to 15 sets.

2.         Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right-of-way permits and concurrency

prior to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

3.         Please be advised that no model homes or centers will be permitted prior to recording of the final plat.

Any such structures shall also require approval of a “Mini Site Plan”.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

CONDITIONS:

1.         A South Florida Water Management District permit/modification is required.

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY (911 ADDRESSING)

CONDITIONS:

1.         Please submit preliminary plan for street naming and numbering review to the 911 Addressing

Department.

 

Mr. Theobald noted that they already have an address.

 

Mr. Groenendaal indicated that they need to resubmit and come back to DRC with construction plans and to make sure they also show underground utility.

 

FINDING: 

Mr. Groenendaal requested a continuance, for the provision of construction plans, 15 sets pluan an application. 

 

 

 

 

3.                   Case #07-29.02 – Old Hickory Tree Corner (John Groenendaal, Senior Planner)

SW Corner of Old Hickory Tree Road and US 192

Final Plat; 5 lots; 10.5 acres

 

Karl Theobald was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this final plat.

 

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         With the implementation of the Cyber Spot wireless system thru out the City of St. Cloud, “Cyber Spot

Capital Expansion” charges will apply prior to development of said property.

This fee shall be assessed as follows:

Per Residential Unit: $118.46

Per square foot of Commercial property: $0.0068

Please reference Resolution #2005-418R, Ordinance #2005-168, and Section 6.1.10.1 of the

Land Development Code.

2.         Please note that all cases do not necessarily require poles, but in the cases that do require poles, the

following guidelines will apply.

1. Poles that provide a minimum mounting height of 25 feet, as recommended by the Radio

manufacture and a continuous, non-switched power source, will be required, at the developer’s

expense, for mounting of the radios.

2. In instances of decorative light poles, matching decorative poles, providing a minimum

mounting height of 25 feet, as recommended by the Radio manufacture and a continuous, nonswitched

power source, will be required, at the developer’s expense, for mounting of the radios.

3. Please note that this is a combined effort with OUC and the City of St. Cloud for the acquisition

and placement of the poles that needs to be addressed by the developer during the street lighting

design phase.

4. A layout of the electric system showing transformer locations and street lighting needs too be

supplied to the IT department as soon as possible for determining the number of poles required and

location of the poles.

 

Mr. Theobald wanted to know if they have to pay the fee.

 

Mr. Peck noted that they would need to pay the fee and that it would be broken down with the bowling alley and as the rest of the lots are developed.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated as they submit site plans they will be assessed.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         The driveway serving lot 1 and lot 4 will need to be adjusted as reference in the previous case #07-

29.01.

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         The utility easements shown on lot no. 4 do not match the approved construction plans.

2.         Easements will be required for the utility locations to lot numbers 1, 2, 3 & 5.

3.         Section 5.3.3 Required submittals for Final Plan and Plat states that final engineering drawings are

required

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Recommend denial

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1. Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

1.         Need to show the PB and Page of the surrounding plats, in this case St. Cloud East Commercial

enter.

2.         This will require a joinder

3.         Final plat shall be recorded within 6 months of the City Council approval.

4.         Improvements shall be bonded.

INFORMATION:

1.         Revised plans must be submitted within sixty (60) days of this review. Revised plans submitted after the

allotted time frame will require a new application including payment of additional fees. Please be

advised that the number of plans required for submittal has increased to 15 sets.

2.         Applicant shall confer with Osceola County regarding access, right-of-way permits and concurrency

prior to Final Site Plan approval for any development application that impacts a County Road.

3.         Please be advised that no model homes or centers will be permitted prior to recording of the final plat.

Any such structures shall also require approval of a “Mini Site Plan”.

 

Mr. Groenendaal noted that when they submit they need to make sure they have a Plat Book and Page number.

 

Mr. Theobald wanted to know if they needed a joinder agreement.

 

Mr. Groenendaal noted they would because of multiple owners.

 

Mr. Nearing wanted to know if there would be in closings before the final plat is recoreded.

 

Mr. Theobald indicated that there would be.

 

Mr. Nearing noted that they will need a joinder.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. Recommend for approval.

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY (911 ADDRESSING)

CONDITIONS:

1. Please submit final plat for street naming and numbering review to the 911 Addressing Department.

 

Mr. Nearing indicated that if they don’t have a Preliminary they can’t have a Final.

 

FINDING:

            DRC recommends denial

 

4.                   Case #07-30.01 – Rockers/Crittenden Property (Jeff Higgins, Planner)

1451 – 1561 E Irlo Bronson Memorial Highway

PUD Amendment

 

Rusty Spivey was present to represent the application.

 

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         No comments on this PUD amendment.

 

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS:

1.         No Comments.

 

PUBLIC WORKS

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

 

LINES DIVISION

CONDITIONS:

1.         No comments.

 

FIRE DEPARTMENT

INFORMATION:

1.         Approval of this case will not cause an adverse affect on fire rescue department operations.

 

PLANNING

CONDITIONS:

i) Sign regulations.

The common area Tract shall be allowed one (1) free standing sign Tract A-D shall be permitted one (1)

freestanding sign and one (1) monumental sign. The freestanding sign shall be allowed a maximum of sixtyfour (64) square feet in area. The monumental sign shall be allowed a maximum of forty (40) square feet in area and not exceed eight (8) feet in height. Provided such sign meets all requirements of the City of St. Cloud sign regulations for free standing and monumental signage for an individual parcel. Parcels A, B, C, D, and E shall be allowed all other allowable signage within the sign regulations except for free standing signage.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Approval.

 

Mr. Spivey indicated that they would like 2 free standing signs.  He noted that there are 4 lots and 2 buildings, a smaller sign would not work out.

 

Mr. Groenendaal wanted to know if they could live with 64 square feet with a monument sign.  The reason he noted was because they already have a free standing sign.

 

Discussion on monumental signs versus free standing signs.

 

Mr. Nearing suggested that he meet with Mr. Higgins and find an acceptable location for the monumental sign.

 

INFORMATION:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.         Recommend approval.

 

FINDING:

DRC recommended approval with conditions.

 

CONSENT AGENDA

 

            1.         Deferral of Annexation

                                    Case #07-200.01 – Willett, Joseph P. –1020 Albany Avenue

                                    Case #07-200.02 – Bailey, Vincent J. – 1142 E. Lakeshore Blvd.

                                    Case #07-200.03 – Latour, Scott – 3840 Friars Cove Road

                                    Case #07-200.04 – Martz, Brian – 625 Eastern Avenue

 

FINDING: Consent Agenda was approved

 

Adjournment:   2:32                 

 

If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Committee/Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearing/meeting, such person will need a record of the proceedings and that, for this purpose, such person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, and which record is not provided by the City of St. Cloud. (FS 286.0105) In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, persons needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the secretary/Clerk of the Committee/Board listed below, prior to the meeting (FS286.26) Michelle Orton (407) 957-8428 – morton@stcloud.org